How we know the Sunnah of the Prophet (saw) is divine guidance.

“There has certainly been for you in the Messenger of Allah an excellent pattern of conduct for anyone whose hope is in Allah and the Last Day and [who] remembers Allah often” (Qur’an 33:21)

﷽ 

One of the reasons that we know that the Sunnah of the Blessed Prophet (saw) is a source of revelation and guidance for us is that every aspect of his blessed life down to the minute minutia would be regulated and corrected by Allah (swt).

In other words, if there is something that the Blessed Prophet (saw) said, or did that was not approved by Allah (swt), there would be a revelation that would bring correction and guidance.

“And He found you lost and guided [you].” (Qur’an 93:7)

It is very clear that the Sunnah of the Blessed Messenger is an authoritative source of law for us as Muslims.

He who obeys the Messenger has obeyed Allah, but those who turn away-We have not sent you over them as a guardian.” (Qur’an 4:80)

So it is clear we are not seeking to dispute the Sunnah (words, deeds, actions, treaties) of the Blessed Messenger (saw) as a source of law.

We are simply saying that it is not equal to the authoritative weight of the Qur’an.

Let us start off with something very powerful from Allah (swt).

“This [Qur’an] is sent down from the Lord of all the worlds. If [the Prophet] had said anything against Us, We would certainly have seized his right hand and cut off his artery, and none of you could have defended him.” (Qur’an 69:43-47)

ALLAH!!!

Now can you imagine the Blessed Prophet (saw) being known as Rasūlullāh, Ḥabībullāh, Nabiyyullāh and Shafīʿullāh? That even this blessed being esteemed as He (saw) is that the Lord of the Worlds, the Lord of Might, did not leave out from his revelation that he would cut off his aorta valve!

This is if he said anything against Allah (swt).  So we know from this verse that it is impossible for the Prophet (saw) to have said anything contrary to what Allah (swt) said! Nor would the Prophet (saw) act, or speak in a way that displeases Allah (swt). In fact, this article will show you that the life of the Blessed Messenger (saw) was regulated down to the most minute details. It also shows us that this is conclusive proof that the life of the Blessed Messenger(saw) is a source of divine guidance for Muslims.

“And follow that which is revealed to you from your Lord. Indeed, Allah is ever, with what you do, Acquainted.” (Qur’an 33:2)

There are four misunderstandings that are common among Muslims.

  1. That everything that the Prophet (saw) said, or did is revelation.
  2. That everything that the Prophet (saw) said, or did is not revelation.
  3. That the Sunnah is equal in weight to the Qur’an as being authoritative.
  4. The idea that the Sunnah can abrogate or override the Qur’an.

In fact, the above text (Qur’an 69:43-47) is sufficient to prove points 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 above.

This method is internally cogent and consistent and other methods in jurisprudence are hard-pressed to find any flaws in this methodological approach.

The next verse

Nor does he speak out of desire.” (Qur’an 53:3) 

I would honestly say this has to be the most abused text of the entire revelation.

It is this very verse that is unjustifiably used (and abused, might we add) to claim that every action, deed, saying, of the Blessed Messenger (saw) had divine sanction behind it.

We feel that the context of this verse is completely ignored by many fellow traditionalists.

“I swear by the star when it goes down. Your Companion is neither astray nor being misled Nor does he speak out of (l-hawa) desire. It is an inspiration (wahyun) that is inspired (yuha).” (Qur’an 53:1-4)

The ‘It’ is in the revelation is not definitive.

The ‘It’ can refer to the ‘words, deeds, actions, and treaties‘ of the Blessed Messenger (saw).

The ‘It’ can be a reference to the Qur’an itself.

The difference between divine inspiration (the Sunnah) and divine revelation sent down (Qur’an, Torah, Injil)

“And who is more unjust than one who invents a lie about Allah or says, “It has been inspired(uhiya) to me,” while nothing has been (yuha) inspired to him, and one who says, “I will reveal (sa-unzilu) like what Allah (anzala) revealed.” And if you could but see when the wrongdoers are in the overwhelming pangs of death while the angels extend their hands, [saying], “Discharge your souls! Today you will be awarded the punishment of [extreme] humiliation for what you used to say against Allah other than the truth and [that] you were, toward His verses, being arrogant.”(Qur’an 6:93)

Three categories:
The one who invents a lie about Allah.
The one who says it has been (yuha) inspired to me.
The one who says I will (anzala) reveal like what Allah revealed.


“With truth have We sent it (anzalna) down, and with truth hath it (nazala)descended. And We have sent thee as naught else save a bearer of good tidings and a warner.” (Qur’an 17:105)

“And your Lord (ahwa) inspired the Bee to build its cells in hills, on trees, and in (men’s) habitations.” (Qur’an 16:68)

And the verse “He does not speak of his desire” is so badly abused and the claim is that every single thing that came out of the Blessed Prophets mouth was an inspired revelation.

Well, didn’t the Blessed Prophet (saw) have private conversations with his wives?

So if he said something like “Oh Aisha! I am thirsty, so could you give me some water?” Is this revelation?

Or if he said, “I need to go take care of something, and I’ll be back in 5 minutes.”

Is this revelation? Think about it! He was a human being as well as a Messenger of Allah. Surely he had daily conversations with people.

The real truth is everything the Prophet (saw) said or did is inspired revelation unless it was corrected and guided by Allah (swt).

Without a doubt, this misconception begins with the misunderstanding of the previous verses: (Qur’an 53:1-4)

The idea that the Sunnah can abrogate or override the Qur’an

You will never find any instance or example internally in the Qur’an (common agreed-upon point of reference) where the Blessed Prophet (saw) corrected Allah (swt), overturned a decision of Allah (swt). There is not a single reference at all for this.

However, we do have the following internal evidence within the Qur’an (common agreed-upon point of reference) where Allah (swt) corrected the Blessed Messenger (saw), overturned a decision by the Blessed Messenger (saw).

“The Prophet is a friend (awla) to the believers more than they are to their own selves, and his wives are their mothers. Blood relations have more rights to one another, according to the Book of Allah, than do the believers and Muhajirun. Nevertheless, you may act kindly toward your (awla) friends. All this is inscribed in the Book.” (Qur’an 33:6)

The Blessed Prophet (saw) is the mawla (ally, protector) of the believers. Even in this capacity, Allah (swt) has given guidance or correction on where the Blessed Messenger (saw) went, of course.

“O Prophet! Why are you holding something to be forbidden which Allah has made lawful to you? You seek to please your consorts. But Allah is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful.” (Qur’an 66:1)

Anyone familiar with what is considered the historical context of this verse knows the Blessed Messenger (saw) swore off honey for a period of time to please some of his jealous and envious wives. Yet, Allah (swt) has reminded the Blessed Messenger (saw), telling him to not make forbidden that which Allah (swt) has made permissible!

We will never find a single example internally within the Qur’an in which the Prophet (saw) corrected Allah (swt), advised Allah (swt), or overturned a decision given by Allah (swt).  Not once!

Yet another example:

“Allah has indeed heard (and accepted) the statement of the woman who argues with you concerning her husband and carries her complaint (in prayer) to Allah and Allah (always) hears the arguments between both sides among you: for Allah hears and sees (all things). If any men among you divorce their wives by Zihar (calling them mothers), they cannot be their mothers: None can be their mothers except those who gave them birth. And in fact, they use words (both) iniquitous and false: but truly Allah is one that blots out (sins), and forgives (again and again). But those who divorce their wives by Zihar, then wish to go back on the words they uttered,- (It is ordained that such a one) should free a slave before they touch each other: You are admonished to perform: and Allah is well-acquainted with (all) that you do. And if any has not (the wherewithal), he should fast for two months consecutively before they touch each other. But if any is unable to do so, he should feed sixty indigent ones, this, that you may show your faith in Allah and His Messenger. Those are limits (set by) Allah. For those who reject (Him), there is a grievous Penalty.” (Qur’an 58: 1-4)

As many of you may know regarding what is considered the historical context of these verses, Khawlah bint Tha‘labah (ra) went to the Blessed Messenger (saw) to complain about her husband. Many times it is reported that the Blessed Messenger (saw) gave his verdict on the matter.

Now, this should give us pause.

Here we have the case of this woman who, even after hearing the decision of the Blessed Messenger (saw), continued to argue with him!  In other words, the Sunnah of the Prophet (saw) wasn’t good enough for her!  That’s right.  She didn’t simply say, “Yes, Oh Messenger of Allah, thank you!”  No!  This woman went to the highest authority of justice and wisdom that there is. She took her pain directly to Allah (swt)!

So Allah (swt) took the side of the woman over the side of the Blessed Messenger (saw)!

That is why there is a distinction between:

When the Messenger decides a matter and when Allah and his Messenger decide a matter.

“It is not for a believer, man, or woman when Allah and His Messenger have decreed a matter that they should have any option in their decision. And whoever disobeys Allah and His Messenger, he has indeed strayed in plain error.” (Qur’an 33:36)

This is why we have:

“The only statement of the [true] believers when they are called to Allah and His Messenger to judge between them is that they say, “We hear and we obey.” And those are the successful.” (Qur’an 24:51)

Now in light of the above verses, if Khawlah bint Tha‘labah (ra) had not received a response in which Allah (swt) responded to her, she would have been sinful for disobeying the Messenger of Allah.

So this lets us know that when the Blessed Messenger (saw) decrees something, it is absolutely authoritative unless Allah (swt) has stated otherwise.

We will never find a single example internally within the Qur’an in which the Prophet (saw) corrected Allah (swt), advised Allah (swt), or overturned a decision given by Allah (swt).  Not once!

In fact, this historical narrative shows that the Blessed Messenger (saw) was/is indeed a Messenger of Allah (swt) and not a messenger of his own design and making.

“When you said to the one whom Allah has blessed and you have favored, “Keep your wife and be mindful of  Allah” while concealing within yourself that which Allah was about to disclose. In doing so You feared people, whereas it is  Allah whom you should fear. So, when Zayd divorced her, We married her to you. We do not want believers to have restrictions concerning their adopted sons’ wives after they divorce them, for Allah’s God’s command must be carried out.” (Qur’an 33:37) 

Now while one may ultimately conclude from this that Allah gave to the Blessed Messenger (saw) that which was intended to give him, without this verse he would have no indication of this. The sunnah of the Prophet (saw) was to advise Zayd to stay with his wife.   Allah (swt) has overridden the decision.

The Prophet (saw) was guided by Allah (swt) when he used his own ijtihad (his own understanding) in devising a strategy in giving dawah.

He frowned and turned ˹his attention˺ away, simply˺ because the blind man came to him ˹interrupting. You never know ˹O Prophet˺, perhaps he may be purified, or he may be mindful, benefitting from the reminder. As for the one who was indifferent, you gave him your ˹undivided˺ attention, even though you are not to blame if he would not be purified. But as for the one who came to you, eager ˹to learn˺, being in awe ˹of Allah, you were inattentive to him. But no! This ˹revelation˺ is truly a reminder. (Qur’an 80:1-11)

Another example:

And say not of anything: Lo! I shall do that tomorrow without adding, “if Allah so wills!” But if you forget, then remember your Lord, and say, “I trust my Lord will guide me to what is more right than this.” (Qur’an 18:23-24)

This is an important reminder to the Blessed Prophet (saw) and to the believers.

We do not know if we will even be around the next day or if we will even have the ability to say things. If we ever find ourselves by mistake making a promise, we should remember Allah (swt) immediately with ‘Insh’Allah’

“Verily, you (O Muhammed) guide not whom you like, but Allah guides whom He wills. And He knows best those who are guided.” (Quran 28:56)

So the Blessed Prophet (saw) can make all the du’a and supplications for any person he wishes. Yet, if that person goes against what Allah (swt) has decreed and has gone against the Sunnah of the Blessed Messenger (saw) and has not reformed themselves, they would not be among the guided. Even if they are a beloved companion or a beloved family member.

“˹It does not matter˺ whether you ˹O Prophet˺ pray for them to be forgiven or not. Even if you pray for their forgiveness seventy times, Allah will never forgive them. That is because they have lost faith in Allah and His Messenger. And Allah does not guide the rebellious people.” (Qur’an 9:80)

May Allah pardon you, [O Muhammed]; why did you give them permission [to remain behind]?  [You should not have] until it was evident to you who were truthful and you knew [who were] the liars.” (Qur’an 9:43)

To usdear respected readers, those who have followed Prima-Qur’an: Ibadi perspectives on Islam for some time, this has to be a very big oversight on behalf of some of our respected scholars.

The inability of not being able to distinguish the following:

1) Muhammed (saw) the human being

&

2) Muhammed (saw) the Messenger of Allah (saw).

Take, for example, the following text:

Rafi’ b. Khadij reported that Allah’s Messenger (saw) came to Medina and the people had been grafting the trees. He said:

What are you doing? They said: We are grafting them, whereupon he said: It may be good for you if you do not do that, so they abandoned this practice (and the date palms began to yield less fruit). They made a mention of it (to the Holy Prophet), whereupon he said: I am a human being, so when I command you about a thing pertaining to religion, do accept it, and when I command you about a thing from my personal opinion, keep it in mind that I am a human being. ‘Ikrima reported that he said something like this.

Source: (https://sunnah.com/muslim:2362)

Musa b. Talha reported:

I and Allah’s Messenger (saw) happened to pass by people near the date palm trees. He (the Holy Prophet) said: What are these people doing? They said: They are grafting, i. e. they combine the male with the female (tree) and thus they yield more fruit. Thereupon Allah’s Messenger (saw) said: I do not find it to be of any use. The people were informed about it and they abandoned this practice. Allah’s Messenger (saw) (was later) informed (that the yield had dwindled), whereupon he said: If there is any use of it, then they should do it, for it was just a personal opinion of mine, and do not go after my personal opinion; but when I say to you anything on behalf of Allah, then do accept it, for I do not attribute lie to Allah, the Exalted and Glorious.

Source: (https://sunnah.com/muslim:2361)

Anas reported that Allah’s Messenger (saw) happened to pass by the people who had been busy in grafting the trees. Thereupon he said:

If you were not to do it, it might be good for you. (So they abandoned this practice) and there was a decline in the yield. He (the Holy Prophet) happened to pass by them (and said): What has gone wrong with your trees? They said: You said so and so. Thereupon he said: You have better knowledge (of a technical skill) of the affairs of the world.

Source: (https://sunnah.com/muslim:2363)

Unfortunately, many do not seem to make this distinction.

Recall the above verse:

“This [Qur’an] is sent down from the Lord of all the worlds. If [the Prophet] had said anything against Us, We would certainly have seized his right hand and cut off his artery, and none of you could have defended him.” (Qur’an 69:43-47)

Nor does he speak out of (l-hawa) desire. It is an inspiration (wahyun) that is inspired (yuha) (Qur’an 53:3-4)

“O you who believe, you shall obey Allah, AND obey the messenger. Otherwise, all your works will be in vain.” (Qur’an 47:33)

So we know that obey Allah AND obey the Messenger is a reference to the Qur’an and to the inspiration that Allah (swt) has given to his Messenger (saw).

In regard to the Qur’an, the Prophet (saw) is an expositor or muffasir. That means to explain via his Sunnah those instructions which are not spelled out in the Qur’an. Or to explain that which is not clear, if the message in and of itself is clear, then one would only need to deliver the message if the message contains data that needs to be spelled out or an expositor would need to explain it clearly.

“And obey Allah and obey the Messenger. But if you turn away, then Our Messenger is responsible only for conveying the message (l-balaghu) clearly(l-mubina). (Quran 64:12)

“But if you they turn away [Prophet], remember that your only conveying this message clearly.” (Qur’an 16:82)

We know that the Messenger (saw) spoke like a human being having normal human conversations in his day-to-day interactions with his wives and his companions. We also know that he spoke as an authority just as Allah (swt) informed us. He also spoke under divine inspiration and gave divinely inspired instructions that are not recorded in the Qur’an.

Just as in the time of the Blessed Messenger (saw) he has authority over us and would command us:

“˹Remember, O  Prophet,˺ when you left your home in the early morning to position the believers in the battlefield. And Allah is All-Hearing, All-Knowing.” (Qur’an 3:121)

Or, for example, the appointment of the Qibla which is not mentioned at all in the Qur’an.

When the Muslims arrived in Madina, the Blessed Messenger (saw) commanded them to pray facing Jerusalem. This continued until Allah (swt) revealed:

“So turn your face toward al-Masjid al-haram.” (Qur’an 2:144)

Some of the non-Muslims criticized this order, and demanded to know why the Qiblah was originally Jerusalem, but had now been changed. So Allah revealed:

We did not appoint the Qiblah that you were on, except to distinguish the ones who follow the messenger from the ones who would turn back on their heels.” (Qur’an 2:143)

In other words, this was a trial from Allah. However, although Allah attributes the appointment of the previous Qiblah to Himself, this appointment is not found anywhere in the Qur’ān. It was the Blessed Messenger (saw) who told the believers to face Jerusalem, based upon revelation from Allah. This revelation was not part of the Qur’ān, but it was a revelation via the Sunnah which Allah (swt) revealed to the Prophet (saw).

Behold! Allah promised you one of the two parties, that it should be yours: You wished that the one unarmed should be yours, but Allah willed to justify the Truth according to His words and to cut off the roots of the Unbelievers.” (Qur’an 8:7)

Does anyone recall when Allah (swt) made this promise to the Blessed Messenger (saw)? Where is that statement at anywhere in the Qur’an?

Allah promised that the Muslims would either gain the caravan of Abū Sufyān, or defeat the army of Abū Jahl. However, this promise made by Allah is not found anywhere in the Qur’ān.

It was conveyed to the believers by the Blessed Prophet. However, the verse states ‘Allah promised you’ and not ‘the Prophet promised you’. Hence, the Blessed Prophet (saw) received the promise from Allah through unrecorded revelation that is not included in the Qur’an!

“With clear proofs and divine Books. And We have sent down to you the Reminder, so that you may explain to people what has been revealed for them, and perhaps they will reflect.” (Qur’an 16:44)

Where is this explanation at? If the Qur’an was a self-evident revelation, there would be no need for an expositor.

Those who reject the instruction to follow the Blessed Prophet (saw) are dumbfounded about how to carry out the following order:

“and bow down with those who bow down.” (Qur’an 2:43)

and

“and bow along with those who bow down.” (Qur’an 3:43)

They can only offer glibly it means to bow down with others. However, the Qur’an itself does not indicate how this is done or in what manner.

We then become like those whom Allah (swt) warned about in the Qur’an.

“Although they have no knowledge of this. They follow nothing but assumptions. And surely assumptions can in no way replace the truth.” (Qur’an 53:28)

“It is He who has sent among the unlettered a Messenger from themselves reciting to them His verses and purifying them and teaching them the Book and wisdom – although they were before in clear error.” (Qur’an 62:2)

The above verse becomes even more powerful when you reflect on the fact that the masses of people were illiterate at that time, and they were dependent upon oral recitation

All the Qur’an is revelation but not all of Allah’s revelation is in the Qur’an.

Further proof that the Blessed Messenger (saw) received revelation other than the Qur’ān is that the compilation of the Qur’ān is not in its chronological order. Verses revealed in Makkah are found in Madanī chapters and vice versa. Likewise, chapters revealed in Madina come before the chapters revealed in Makkah. The arrangement of verses within surahs, and the arrangement of the surahs within the Qur’ān could only have been done by the Blessed Messenger (saw) based upon revelation from Allah. As Allah commands the Blessed Messenger (saw) to say:

“When Our clear revelations are recited to them, those who do not expect to meet Us say ˹to the Prophet˺, “Bring us a different Quran or make some changes in it.” Say ˹to them˺, “It is not for me to change it on my own. I only follow what is revealed to me. I fear, if I were to disobey my Lord, the punishment of a tremendous Day.” (Qur’an 10:15)

So, following the Qur’an in the order that it is today, verse after verse everyone who calls themselves a Muslim is following the Sunnah, and not the Qur’an. The Qur’an does not give us the order and arrangement of its verses and surahs.

PRIMA QUR’AN OR PRIMA MUHAMMED?

It had occurred to us that in reality this website could very well be called: “Prima-Muhammed.” In what sense? In the sense that in reality the early community of Muslims had very little Qur’an and a great deal of the Blessed Messenger (saw).

Think about it. Who witnessed the Blessed Prophet (saw) receive the revelation in the Cave?

If Muhammed (saw) was not established as Al Amin (The Trustworthy), would the Qur’an even be accepted? From the seerah (life & history) of the Blessed Messenger (saw), we read how people became Muslim, more so because of the noble and honorable character of the Blessed Messenger (saw) and less so because they actually sat down and pondered over particular verses and chapters of the Qur’an. When these occasions do happen—as in the case of the conversion of Umar (ra)—they stand out and are noteworthy.

And We made them leaders guiding by Our command. (wa-awḥaynā) And We inspired to them the doing of good deeds, establishment of prayer, and giving of zakah; and they were worshippers of Us.” (Qur’an 21:73)

The Blessed and Noble Prophet (saw) his doing of good, his establishing of the Prayer and his method of giving Zakah are all revelation. Those who reject the clear verses of Allah (swt) are none but the disbelievers. The methodology to establish the prayer and the amount and methodology of giving the zakah are revelations not recorded in the Qur’an.

“Say, “If I should err, I would only err against myself. But if I am guided, it is by what my Lord reveals to me. Indeed, He is Hearing and near.” (Qur’an 34:50)

“O you who believe, you shall obey Allah, AND obey the messenger. Otherwise, all your works will be in vain.” (Qur’an 47:33)

“Say, “I am not something original among the messengers, nor do I know what will be done with me or with you. I only follow that which is revealed to me, and I am not but a clear warner.” (Qur’an 46:9)

“When the prayers are over, remember Allah—whether you are standing, sitting, or lying down. But when you are safe, establish regular prayers. Indeed, performing prayers is a duty on the believers at the appointed times.(Qur’an 4:103)

If Allah revealed to the Prophet (saw) to do the prayer and the zakat, then what is that way that Allah revealed to him obligated upon the Prophet (saw) and not upon us?!

Why is that way preserved for that community and not for us?!

And follow what is revealed to you, [O Muhammed], and be patient until Allah will judge. And He is the best of judges.” (Qur’an 10:109)

“Recite, [O Muhammed], what has been revealed to you of the Book and establish prayer. Indeed, prayer prohibits immorality and wrongdoing, and the remembrance of Allah is greater. And Allah knows that which you do.” (Qur’an 29:45)

So Muhammed (saw) had to follow prayer, but we do not?

As the Muslims have split into various theological and sectarian factions, we have no choice but to weigh the various oral traditions in light of the Qur’an. However, to dismiss the oral traditions outright is to dismiss the revelation given to the Blessed Messenger (saw) that is extraneous to the Qur’an. 

They are invited to the book of Allah to settle their dispute”. (Qur’an 3:23)

It is the Qur’an that regulates and gives authority to the Sunnah; not the other way around.

“It is not for any human being  that Allah should give him the Book, and the wisdom and the Prophethood that he should then say to men: ‘Be devoted to me rather than Allah, but rather (he would say): “Become men of Allah by spreading the knowledge of the divine writ, and by your own deep study of it.”  (Qur’an 3:79)

You will never find any instance or example internally in the Qur’an (common agreed-upon point of reference) where the Blessed Prophet (saw) corrected Allah (swt), overturned a decision of Allah (swt).

The Qur’an totally dominates the Sunnah and regulates its characteristics and behaviors. It is never the other way around.

In fact, what we feel many Muslim and Christian theologians fail to recognize is that no human being, Prophet, or otherwise can truly be an example for us unless they make mistakes and errors in judgment and learn from them.  It is, after all, part of the human experience.  That is after all the teaching of Adam and Eve (upon them both be peace).

It is the teaching not of perfect infallible human beings devoid of human experience, so that we can achieve this idea of the Insān-i Kāmil — ‘The Perfect Man’, far from it. The teaching is about Allah (swt), a loving Creator that forgives when we err and guides when we stray. All this provided that we in turn do our part by obeying his commands and asking for repentance when we err.

Often our theologians have imposed their own ideas upon the text and made them say things they didn’t say to begin with.

An example (and in relation to this post). This example is for educational purposes, and it is not intended to slight any of our respected scholars.

“That Allah may forgive you of your errors that which is past and that which is to come, and may perfect His favour unto you, and may guide you on a right path,” (Qur’an 48:2)

This verse perhaps has been manipulated in the English translation as well.

http://www.islamawakened.com/quran/48/2/

*Mohammad Tahir-ul-Qadri*  has translated the above as:

“So that Allah forgives, for your sake, all the earlier and later sins (of all those people) of your Umma ([Community]* who struggled, fought and sacrificed by your command), and (this way) may complete His blessing on you (outwardly and inwardly) in the form of Islam’s victory and forgiveness for your Umma (Community), and may keep (your Umma) firm-footed on the straight path (through your mediation).”

This seems like quite an abuse of the text.

* Note:  We understand the people of Sufism to be lovers of Al-Haqq (The Truth) and not people who manipulate the religion. So I am suggesting that this is perhaps an oversight on behalf of our respected Shaykh Tahir-ul-Qadri.

Or it is perhaps that the apparent meaning is that the Blessed Messenger (saw) committed minor infractions.  Perhaps due to the theological inclinations of respected Shaykh Tahir ul Qadri, it was his intention to have this be interpreted in another manner.

Once a person understands the theological underpinnings that some have concerning the infallibility of prophets, perhaps it becomes crystal clear why he would want to make the text conform to a certain understanding.

May Allah (swt) bless him and bless us.  May Allah (swt) guide him and guide us.

The translation of the respected Shaykh clashes with translators from such diverse  and disparate backgrounds as (Yusuf Ali, Pickthall, Muhsin Khan, Sahih International, Aisha Bewley, Dr. Ghali, T. B Irving, and Muhammad Asad)

The Arabic text is: Liyaghfira laka Allahu mataqadd

We leave that to you, the reader, to reflect upon.

He who obeys the Messenger has obeyed Allah, but those who turn away-We have not sent you over them as a guardian.” (Qur’an 4:80)

Both the revelation of Allah revealed as the Qur’an and the revelation as inspiration revealed to the Blessed Messenger are authoritative as guidance for Muslims.

However, as the following verse shows Allah (swt) is in total control over all things.

“This [Qur’an] is sent down from the Lord of all the worlds. If [the Prophet] had said anything against Us, We would certainly have seized his right hand and cut off his artery, and none of you could have defended him.” (Qur’an 69:43-47)

“Allah wishes to make clear to you, and guide you to the traditions of those who were before you, and to accept repentance of you, and Allah is All-Knower, All-Wise.” (Qur’an 4:26)

We as Muslims ask in our five daily prayers in every rakat to follow the straight path.

“Guide us to the the straight path (ih’dina l-sirata l-mus’taqima)” (Qur’an 1:6)

That straight path is adhering to the Qur’an and the Sunnah.

“And thus We have revealed to you an inspiration of Our command. You did not know what is the Book or [what is] faith, but We have made it a light by which We guide whom We will of Our servants. And indeed, you guide to a (siratin mus’taqimin) straight path.”(Qur’an 42:52)

May Allah (swt) guide the Ummah.

May Allah (swt) forgive the Ummah.

4 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized

4 responses to “How we know the Sunnah of the Prophet (saw) is divine guidance.

  1. A poor sinner's avatar A poor sinner

    Dear Sir-You raise a number of interesting points. Over the years I have interacted with numerous Sunni apologists who hold to the notion that the Islamic prophet was wholly infallible and incapable of actions contrary to the will of God. If I may ask, does your school deny this ?

    • Thank you for your question.

      If a human cannot be ascribed with the capacity to rebel against Allah than no virtue can be ascribed to them.

      No one speaks about how chaste robots are.

      Automatons are never virtuous.

      We do not speak about how chaste infants are.

      Only with ability, desire and awareness of what we do comes the capacity and capability to rebel or to submit.

      This is why in Islam until one becomes mukallaf the pen is lifted.

      Anyone who says that any Prophet (Jesus, Muhammed, Moses) -upon them all be peace, are infallible takes away their humanity.

      Anyone who says that any Prophet (Jesus, Muhammed, Moses) upon them all be peace, cannot act contrary to the will of God, takes away any virtue that could possibly be ascribed to them.

      One of the teachers of our school discusses about this here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O9Njt_8PSuM&t=9s

      Btw I saw your user name: “A poor sinner” . We are all of us poor before the Sovereign Majesty of the Creator. Who owns all things and is in need of nothing. Though you may be a poor sinner I hope that you are also one rich and abundant in taking every opportunity to turn to you Oft Forgiving, Oft Relenting Lord to seek rectification for your struggles.

      May Allah bless you and I and may Allah guide you and I.

  2. A poor sinner's avatar A poor sinner

    Dear Sir-Thank you very much for your kind and informative reply. What you say is very interesting, given that Sunni writers perceive perfect prophetic infallibility as central to their authority as valid. This is furthermore central to their critique of the Biblical presentation of the Prophets as fallible men (David sinning with Bathsheba, Isaiah walking the mountains of Israel without cloths) prone to sin, a critique used prior to the rise of Islam by groups such as the Manichean sect.

    Your comments upon human will are particularly intriguing. Would you hold to the notion of a synergy of the human will and the divine will, as suggested by Pelagius or Julian of Eclanum ?These debates regarding free will as either opposed to or subjugated to the divine will would be particularly displayed in the French Jansenist controversy.

    I am a sinner in mind and body, and constantly find myself slipping away from God, the lover of the soul, into my own selfish, cruel and stupid self. Yet I am by the grace of God united to one who is himself unchanging Love, who desires all men to be saved and from whose love nothing can separate me, neither death nor life, neither angels nor demons,neither our fears for today nor our worries about tomorrow—not even the powers of hell can separate us from God’s love. So I pray: “my whole hope is only in Your exceeding great mercy. Give what You command, and command what You will. Thou imposest continency upon us”.

    God love, bless and keep you always.

    • So let me first engage with this:

      “What you say is very interesting, given that Sunni writers perceive perfect prophetic infallibility as central to their authority as valid. This is furthermore central to their critique of the Biblical presentation of the Prophets as fallible men (David sinning with Bathsheba, Isaiah walking the mountains of Israel without cloths) prone to sin, a critique used prior to the rise of Islam by groups such as the Manichean sect.”

      When I stated:

      “Anyone who says that any Prophet (Jesus, Muhammed, Moses) -upon them all be peace, are infallible takes away their humanity.”

      Are not infallible we of course do not mean they debased themselves and became completely debauched.

      The article that intrigued you and triggered a comment shows nothing of the kind in the case of the Blessed Prophet Muhammed (saw).

      We do not believe that Prophets worshipped idols, slept with their daughters or sent people to the hottest part of a conflict in order to score a night in bed with the deceased wife.

      In fact, long ago when debates intrigued me I was going to debate one of the Christians (who changes his denomination every 6 months it seems) on rather or not the Prophet (saw) was of God.

      I knew he would throw all the mud possible upon the Prophet (saw). That would not deter me. None of the things that Christians throw upon the Prophet (saw) would disqualify him from being a Prophet. Especially when we consider the bar for being a Prophet in Christianity is extremely low. As the aforementioned examples attest.

      The only possible point scoring for the Christian side would be that a possible model or idea held about the Prophet (saw) is flawed. Not that Islam is flawed.

      In much the same way that disproving Calvinism means nothing to those Christians whose position on soteriology is other than Calvinism.

      Do understand that when you come to a blog like this and ask:

      “Would you hold to the notion of a synergy of the human will and the divine will, as suggested by Pelagius or Julian of Eclanum ?These debates regarding free will as either opposed to or subjugated to the divine will would be particularly displayed in the French Jansenist controversy.”

      It is akin to me asking you what you think about Imam Shafi in his risala “My differences with Malik” your thoughts on why he wrote it and what are the major points of contention between them in deducing proofs and evidences from the Qur’an & Sunnah.

      It is an assumption you are familiar with the people, the discussions.

      Fair?

      So let me just say that of all the soteriological positions looked at thus far Calvinism portrays the divine in a very cruel and unjust matter.

      That before the foundation of the world he decided who would receive grace and who would not.

      When we press them on what basis does he do this the response is often: “His Love”

      Sure, but what we are asking is on what basis does X receive this Love over Y?

      Especially in light of:

      “Therefore I make known to you that no one speaking by the Spirit of God calls Jesus accursed, and no one can say that Jesus is Lord except by the Holy Spirit.” (1 Corinthians 12:3)

      This becomes a proof text for Calvinist. There are many debates on the issue of regeneration.

      You may want to see for example: https://writingsofbobross.tripod.com/0064.htm

      The challenge is most Christians really do not know if they are saved. I have seen many in my time and when it comes to dressing up a word salad with feel good words and statements of assurance they are quite the word smiths.

      Yet when it really comes down to brass tax we simply ask: “How do YOU know?”

      Especially when you have (Catholics, Orthodox, Presbyterians, Evangelical Trinitarians, Evangelical Oneness, Jehovah’s Witness, Lutherans, Pentacostals, and so on and so forth) there have been apostasy or switching denominations from all major sects of Christianity.

      Yet, those people who abandoned faith or switched churches held fervently, passionately the beliefs of their previous church. They can speak with utmost conviction that is …..until they do not.

      We Muslims say Islam begins the path to salvation but does not guarantee it. But one thing is for certain if one does not even start the journey the end is failure.

      Often Christians will try and ‘one up’ Muslims with this proclamation: “Are you certain of your salvation?”

      I have taught Muslims to ask Christians the very same question and to probe them.

      Controversies surrounding Evanescent Grace are problematic. OSAS (Once Saved Always Saved)..

      Evanescent Grace is well: http://www.examiningcalvinism.com/files/Articles/Evanescent_Grace.html

      You would think the blood of Christ more than sufficient but apparently doctrine plays a role in one’s salvation. In fact, just a curious glimpse in the direction of Christianity one often finds that the Church one attends seems to have more efficacy than the blood of Christ himself. At least the way they have a go at each other.

      Our view is that which the latter Sunni Asharites adopted from us.

      As you are aware issues of doctrine are often fleshed out and not adequately explained over a comment or two.

      There is a resource page : https://primaquran.com/2022/10/05/ahl-al-haqq-wa-l-istiqama-resource-page/

      There is a book by Valerie Hoffman on our school’s theology. For the most part it is a faithful translation. The book is a free PDF file and there is a section pertaining to the interaction between the human will and the divine will.

      God love, bless and keep you always as well.

Leave a comment