“O humanity, indeed We have created you from male and female and made you peoples and tribes that you may know one another. Indeed, the most noble of you in the sight of Allah is the most righteous of you. Indeed, Allah is Knowing, Well Acquainted.” (Qur’an 49:13)
“And do not approach unlawful sexual intercourse, Indeed, it is ever an immorality and is evil as a way.” (Qur’an 17:32)
“So set thy face to the way of life that is upright and in harmony with nature, the pattern which He originated mankind. There is no changing Allah’s creation. That is the upright way of life; but most men know it not.” (Qur’an 30:30)
Allah (swt) reminded us of the promise of Satan where he said:
“And I will command them so they will change the creation of Allah.” (Qur’an 4:119)
﷽
May Allah (swt) bring those who hide in the darkness behind the Rainbow and bring them into the true, the real and the enduring light.
“Allah is the Protector of those who believe. He brings them out of the depths of darkness into the light. As for those who disbelieve, their friends are the Rebels. They bring them out from the light into the depths of darkness. Those are people of the Fire. There they will remain forever.” (Qur’an 2:257)
A reason conversation I had with some overly zealous and not very scientific bunch of LGBTQ advocates.
LGBTQ individuals echo chamber discussion as as follows:
“Fun Fact: While XX and XY are the most common sex chromosomal configurations they are not the only ones. Nor are they the only reason someone is male or female.” -Aaron Martin
“Biological sex is far more convoluted than we think.” -Trisha Norris
“But penis! Vagina!!! you can’t just come in here with scientific facts and logic!”-Lindsey Wright
“The deeper you dig, the more you realize that male and female are still social constructs and that nature doesn’t play those games.” -Aaron Martin
“Nature is weird and every time I hear someone try to use it as an anti lgbt argument I’m so confused. Like where do these people come up with the idea of was is “natural”. Because hermaphrodites dance fighting until one stabs the other with its hard penis Is completely natural in at least one species.” -Lindsey Wright.
“Absolutely! It’s all bs ideological confirmation biasing with middle school ideas. Nature tries everything out and what doesn’t work for us does work for other animals. And as another type of animal we shouldn’t be that surprised. But you would know better than me, lol! You gotta start throwing that Biologist degree around more for these detractors.” -Aaron Martin
“Honestly the 5 years of schooling was worth it just to be like actually…. Bam! Education on the specific subject matter we’re debating!” -Lindsey Wright
“I’m thinking about some kind of Science Ed degree just for that purpose these days.” -Aaron Martin
“If it came up enough I might put those initials behind the fb name like an MD would.” -Aaron Martin
“Just be warned, most of them don’t care what science says if it disagrees with their own bias, F*ck, they don’t care what the bible says if it goes against their own bias.” -Lindsey Wright.
“True.”-Aaron Martin
“Lindsey, you are unusually connected with some of my favourite people. I love this post so much.” -Art Moore.
“Yep. There are multiple instances of XXY or XO. The biological aspect runs real deep. The average person hardly knows that.” -Selena Moore.
“The terms “Male” and “Female” are approximately as useful as the idea that chemical elements are defined solely by the number of protons. They’re reasonably useful for broad categorization, sure, but there’s a *lot* of variation possible there, some of which changes interactions entirely.
For instance, I’m thinking of the difference between hydrogen and deuterium. Both have 1 proton, but Deuterium having a neutron as well significantly changes the chemical properties.” -John Millsaps
“Thank you! I told people this. They can’t grasp the difference between Social Constructs of Gender and Biological Sex.” -Jai Rogers
Prima Qur’an enters the discussion:
“Yes nature does try everting out. Has there ever been a recorded instance of let’s say two test subjects both with a penis or two test subjects both with a vagina reproducing another human being? Looking for an honest answer and scientific journal. You know…. “fun facts”. However, If I am to be met with vitriolic you can go ahead and do the whole cancel culture thing on me. Thanks.” -Prima Qur’an.
“You’re equivocating. This is actually a non-sequitor. Nor does it relate to the Fun Fact I posted! What are you really asking?” -Aaron Martin
“What you first need to understand is that genitals don’t solely define biological or social sex. The above chromosomal patterns often don’t result in the genitals you’d expect. Even if you built a bigoted case on genitals alone it doesn’t merit the genders you think it will.” -Aaron Martin
“Hmm to assume that I am prevaricating seems disingenuous. A non-sequitur? Just curious to see what you think evolution is up to?
“From my atheist science teacher:
The purpose of evolution:
Evolution by natural selection is the process by which traits that enhance survival and reproduction become more common in successive generations of a population.” -Prima Qur’an.
“What you first need to understand is that genitals don’t solely define biological or social sex. The above chromosomal patterns often don’t result in the genitals you’d expect. Even if you built a bigoted case on genitals alone it doesn’t merit the genders you think it will.” -Aaron Martin
“Hmm curious. Could you kindly show where I did? I asked about two test subjects with certain parameters. Never said anything about gender.” -Prima Qur’an .
“My aunt had to adopt because she can’t have kids. By your definition she is not a woman because of that. So I guess there’s a new gender right there.” -Lindsey Wright
“Hmm I am wondering “by your definition”. Curious. Where did I define anything? Let’s not guess or assume. Let us stay focused.” -Prima Qur’an.
“Sweetie you can’t even stay on the original post topic about there being multiple genders. You came in with a weird question totally of topic and whined about “cancel culture” which would indicate you only commented for attention to try and instigate an argument when you didn’t even present an argument.”-Lindsey Wright
“Lindsey Wright I see. Ty for your contribution.”-Prima Qur’an
“You’re using prevaricating wrong. Or at least oddly. Very non-seq given how far afield it is. Evolution is interesting. It has no purpose. I seriously doubt your teacher said anything of the kind, but it looks like enough of a copy and paste job that I’ll answer. Even by that definition there isn’t any “purpose” to evolution. It’s just a natural process. Even if she did post, their scientific papers on the topic” -Aaron Martin
“Whenever you get around to springing your gotcha bs false equivalence of gender and biosex based on your personal ideological sense let us know. Which is your obvious implication with the ‘by your def’ reply. Your insincere accusations are boring.” -Aaron Martin.
“What are you focusing on? That’s not related to anything else here.” -Aaron Martin
“For many of us queers, the inability to reproduce is a feature, not a bug.” -Billy Martin
“This is interesting. How do we know each other again? -Aaron Martin
“Jai Rogers which is related to my question on test subjects how again? Sounds like our pal Mikey went through quite an ordeal. So tell us our scientific over achievers how did the semen go into Mikey’s fallopian tubes again? The baby is coming out the Penis how again? As you were good people as you were.” -Prima Qur’an. (https://www.timesnownews.com/the-buzz/article/mikey-chanel-pmds-trans-teen-who-was-raised-a-boy-is-four-months-pregnant-after-finding-she-has-ovaries-womb/683136)
“Jai Rogers you have a source for that Mikey Chanel post? Appreciate it.” -Prima Qur’an.
“Jai Rogers Nice. I was thinking along these lines. Couldn’t find a story post like this though.” -Aaron Martin
“Jai Rogers Nice. I was thinking along these lines. Couldn’t find a story post like this though.” That in and of itself is telling. Reflect on it.” -Prima Qur’an.
TAKE NOTE OF THE PRESENT BEFORE THEY CHANGE IT IN THE NEAR FUTURE…
In the future medical journals, peer reviews journals, medical professionals, will be fired from their jobs, possibly fined for hate speech and or given prison sentences until they pronounce more ‘scientifically accurate‘ information.
For further reading:
Prima Quran 