“And when it is said to them, “Do not cause corruption on the earth,” they say, “We are but reformers.” Of a surety, they are the ones who make mischief, but they realise (it) not.” (Qur’an 2:11-12)
“And whoever kills a believer intentionally, their reward will be Hell—where they will stay indefinitely. Allah will be displeased with them, condemn them, and will prepare for them a tremendous punishment.” (Qur’an 4:93)
﷽
Ibn Taymiyya and his sect are ready to slaughter all Muslims in the world.
Ibn Taymiyya and his Salafiyyah sect are the one’s who espouse ideas to cut off the heads of all Muslims who are against them and their ideology.
All you need to do is spend a little time on social media, Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, TikTok and you will not fail to who those who are extremist in their ideology, whom they support in reality.
Read it and weep! If people want to ascribe to the early Khawarij the doctrine of take no prisoners and slaughter them all than what do we have here?!
These so called callers of Salafiyyah tell people: “The Khawarij are the dogs of hellfire!” “They Kill Muslims Who Disagree With Them And They’re Views And Give Bloodshedding Fatwas And They’re Blood Is Halal For Them, They’re Extreme Takfiris!”
But let us look at the following text and be reminded of the saying: If the shoe fits wear it!
Interesting…Interesting…
That sounds awfully familiar (ask them the ruling for one who says the Qur’an is Created)
The following text are from Ibn Taymiyya al Harrani as well as his sect!
“We bear witness-and we are the scholars of Makkah-the Authors of these statements and the conclusions found here. That this religion/sect was established by Shaykh Muhammed B. Abdulwahab and was called too by the Imam of the Muslims. Shaykh Saud B AbdulAziz, To the Oneness of Allah and Negating Polytheism. -That is mentioned in the book is the truth of which there is no doubt or uncertainty of. And of that which occurred prior in Makkah and Madinah. -In Egypt and Syria -and all other countries-up until now is from the forms of polytheism (Shirk). That is mentioned in this book as being disbelief (kufr) that makes the committers of such wealth and blood permissible. And they will be damned to hell forever, residing there and whoever does not enter this religion/sect and acts upon it and supports its people and hates its enemies is a disbeliever (kafir) of Allah and the Last Day. And it is obligatory for the Imam of the Muslims and the Muslims themselves to wage war against them (Jihad) and to Kill them until they repent to Allah from that which they were upon. And he must uphold this religion/sect.”
Source: (Al Duraru Sunniyah Fi Al Jawabat Al Najdiyyah, Vol 1, Pg 314.)
“And the caller too innovation what is deserving of them-is the recompense-by agreement of all Muslims. And that recompense is given by killing them or other than that. As the Salaf killed Jahm B. Safwaan, al-Ja’d b. Dirham (teacher of Jahm bin Safwan) and Gilaan Al Qadari and others..”
He goes on to say if you cannot kill them-that being the first and best option-you should at least warn of them. As he says it is from: “Enjoying Good and Forbidding the Evil”, that “Allah has ordered.”
Source: (Majmoo Al Fatawa: Ibn Taymiyya, Page 242.)
“And whoever amongst them is a caller to misguidance, his deviance cannot be removed except by death! Either he shows open repentance and if he does not he is given judgement for his disbelief (kufr). Like the Imams of the Rafidhis (Shias); they are among those who have misguided people. As the Muslims, Gilan Al Qadari, al-Ja’d b. Dirham (teacher of Jahm bin Safwan) and their likes form the deviant callers. Therefore this dajjal is killed absolutely. -And Allah knows best. And for the killing the caller to innovation then he can be killed as well, to stop his misguidance from affecting the people. Just as one at war is killed. Even if the the situation is not the same as the infidels.”
Source: (Majmoo Al Fatawa: Ibn Taymiyya Page 303 And Page 197)
According to the above Fatwa they are ready to kill all Muslims in the world that accept these views!
“And from the book: Taarikh Al Naysapuri – I heard from Muhammed B. Saleh B. Haani, who heard the Imam of the Scholars: Abu Bakr B. Khuzaymah say: “Whoever does not affirm that Allah is over the throne, and has settled on the throne, above the seven heavens and that he is separate from his creation, then he is a kafir-he is obligated to repent or to be struck (killed). Otherwise he will harm the people of the qiblah and the non-Muslims with his presence.”
Source: (Kitab Ijtima Al Juyush Vol 2: Ibn Qayyim.)
“And he was in the 7th Heaven, Because the Prophet (saw) – Saw his Lord. While he was in this world, and did you know that the scholars did no differ that the entirety of the believers will see they’re lord in the hereafter, and not in this world. Whoever denies the seeing of they’re Lord on the day of gathering is not a believer in the eyes of the believers. And He is worse to the scholars than the Jews and Christians and the Magians. As Ibn Mubarak said: “We can bare the sayings of the Christians and Jews but we cannot bare the saying of the Jahmiyyah.” [end of blue section]
Source: (Page 587 Kitab Al Tawheed By Ibn Khuzaymah)
“And from the book: Taarikh Al Naysapuri – I heard from Muhammed B. Saleh B. Haani, who heard the Imam of the Scholars: Abu Bakr B. Khuzaymah say: “Whoever does not affirm that Allah is over the throne, and has settled on the throne, above the seven heavens and that he is separate from his creation, then is a kafir-he is obligated to repent or to be struck (killed). Otherwise he will harm the people of the qiblah and the non-Muslims with his presence.”
The Imam, Ibn Khuzaymah Died In The Year 312 a.h And he says in his book also, “Whoever denies the seeing of Allah in the hereafter, then he is in the sight of the believers, more worse than a Jew or a Christian or a Magian-and they are not believers in the view of the believers.”
Sources: (Kitab ijtima al Juyush Vol 2 Page 194: Ibn Qayyim Kitab Ijtima Al Juyush Vol 2: Ibn Qayyim.)
“This Is The Saved Group, Those who have gathered upon the truth brought by the The Messenger (saw) and that which he was steadfast upon and those who steer upon the path of the Messenger (saw) and his companions. These are the Ahlul Sunnah Wal Jamaah, The people of the noble hadith-the Salafis those that follow the righteous Salaaf-and strive upon their path in upholding the Qur’an and Sunnah and any other sect opposing them-for them is the promise of Hell.”
“Therefore you-oh seeker-are too look at every sect that proclaims they are the saved sect and look into their actions. If their actions actions is in compliance with the Shari’ah then they are the saved sect and if not, then no. And what is the scale that is meant of judging is the Qur’an and Purified Sunnah in (validating) the truth all of it.”
Source: (Fatawaa Noor Alaa Al Darb, Vol 2, Pg 12: Ibn Baz.)
OPEN YOUR EYES DEAR READERS AND SEE FOR YOURSELF! THE SALAFI MANJAH IS UPON THE MANHAJ OF SLAUGHTER AND KILLING.
Ibn Taymiyya al Harrani what is he is talking about!?
If this guy was a transformer his name would be TAKFIRA-TRON.
This Salafiyyah dawah is effective ONLY in that the people they talk to on the streets they only show the people what they want them to see. Those people (who they invite to Islam) are not researchers and they don’t have access to the Arabic language.
If people really know about them they will know that what they present is not Islam at all.
May Allah guide the Ummah.
May Allah forgive the Ummah.
Prima Quran 
Dear sir- I am afraid that my Arabic is not sufficient to read the quotes you have provided with any accuracy. What does the belligerent Ibn Taymiyya say ? It never ceases to fascinate me that, for much of his life and in the centuries following, this Syrian sheikh was seen as a heretic.
He is talking about killing and cutting off the heads of Shi’a and Mutazalites, and anyone who says we will not see Allah (swt) in the next life, Those who don’t believe that Allah (swt) is on his throne even if he repents, his head is to be cut off and thrown in the garbage.
Egypt when on a campaign back in 2015 to remove his many of his colleagues published works. https://muslimvillage.com/2015/06/28/83307/egypt-bans-salafi-books-from-mosques/
AOA, I hope you are doing well. I searched your blog for the topic of jihad but was unable to find any resource on it. I was reading this article and thought to ask my questions here, I hope you are kind enough to answer them in detail. One day i was having discussion with my friends about jihad. They were of the belief that it is obligatory upon muslims to not only create khilafah where every muslim country is under central Caliphate rule but also to wage offensive jihad against non-muslims even if they are not harming muslims in any way. Their reasoning was along these lines:
1.) The four rightly guided Caliphs waged jihad against the neighboring empires of their time. if you say that the Prophet PBUH wrote to them letters to accept Islam they said that how are the general public responsible then? There were no means of mass communication back then and the majority of general public may not even know about the writing of such a letter.
2.) I am not sure if the 4 rightly guided Caliphs also attacked empires to whom no letter was written by the Holy Prophet PBUH. if yes, how proponents of defensive jihad justify this act? These empires were not attacking muslims and no letters were written to them
3.) They cited several verses from the Quran. Some of these verses said that “Allah has given dominance to the Deen of Islam over all other Deens” and one verse has the following meaning “We have made the Deen of Islam guardian/authority over all other deens”. One of the verse was revealed on the occasion of “Treaty of Hudaibayah” when the mushrikeens rejected to write Prophet of Allah with the name of Prophet Muhammad PBUH. So my friends argument was that since the word here is that of Deen and not religion and since Deen is a complete way of life and not simply set of believes and faiths, we cannot allow other deens i.e. other ways of life that are not aligned with Islam to exist in the world. They said that by establishing the system of Islam, non-muslims will get to see the real beauty of Islam first hand and hence their chances of accepting Islam and going to heaven increases.
My question is that: is it obligatory upon Muslims to wage offensive Jihad and establish the system of Islam on all the world? If no, kindly answer how to respond to above queries then? if yes, then how we respond to the common allegation of atheists against religion that religion only causes war. We can see it in Gaza what Jews are doing to muslims. What hindus are doing to Muslims in India. If muslims also start attacking non-muslim countries and suppose christians also start attacking other countries then where is world peace? There will only be terror and chaos in the world. My second question is that if global jihad is obligatory then how come we can convince non-muslims to accept Islam in this age and time by forcefully occupying their lands? they will only start to have extreme contempt for muslims and nothing else even if we establish the greatest social system in the world? isn’t it also open flood gates of atheism in the muslim world when young generation see non-muslims forced to pay jizya tax while also being humiliated while giving it, non-muslims not allowed to practise their faith openly even in their own countries, certain laws also forced on non-muslims in their countries even if they are allowed to do so in their religion?
kindly answer my queries, i want to learn about this topic in detail. Kindly suggest me books, articles, youtube videos and other material that can be helpful in my journey but it must be in english.
Jazak Allah
“AOA, I hope you are doing well. I searched your blog for the topic of jihad but was unable to find any resource on it. I was reading this article and thought to ask my questions here, I hope you are kind enough to answer them in detail. One day i was having discussion with my friends about jihad. They were of the belief that it is obligatory upon muslims to not only create khilafah where every muslim country is under central Caliphate rule but also to wage offensive jihad against non-muslims even if they are not harming muslims in any way. Their reasoning was along these lines.”
AOA Sulemain, Muslims today are not even praying five times a day, brushing their teeth, waking up for tahhajud, performing witr, and many of them love listening to haram music and watching haram television shows. Wha tis their obsession with outward projection of power when we ourselves are in such a corrupt state and condition?
“1.) The four rightly guided Caliphs waged jihad against the neighboring empires of their time. if you say that the Prophet PBUH wrote to them letters to accept Islam they said that how are the general public responsible then? There were no means of mass communication back then and the majority of general public may not even know about the writing of such a letter.”
I do not know about this concept of ‘Rightly Guided Caliphs” because the companions themselves did not have such a concept. The concept sounds like a counter to Shi’a concepts of infallible Imams. The companions themselves revolted against Uthman and the companions themselves fought against Ali, and the companions themselves broke from Ali when he made the decision for arbitration at Siffin. So, I have no idea where they got this “rightly guided” business from. In terms of them waging offensive wars of conquest just because. I also have no idea where they got this concept from.
“2.) I am not sure if the 4 rightly guided Caliphs also attacked empires to whom no letter was written by the Holy Prophet PBUH. if yes, how proponents of defensive jihad justify this act? These empires were not attacking muslims and no letters were written to them.”
I would most likely need more elaboration on this point.
“3.) They cited several verses from the Quran. Some of these verses said that “Allah has given dominance to the Deen of Islam over all other Deens” and one verse has the following meaning “We have made the Deen of Islam guardian/authority over all other deens”. One of the verse was revealed on the occasion of “Treaty of Hudaibayah” when the mushrikeens rejected to write Prophet of Allah with the name of Prophet Muhammad PBUH. So my friends argument was that since the word here is that of Deen and not religion and since Deen is a complete way of life and not simply set of believes and faiths, we cannot allow other deens i.e. other ways of life that are not aligned with Islam to exist in the world. They said that by establishing the system of Islam, non-muslims will get to see the real beauty of Islam first hand and hence their chances of accepting Islam and going to heaven increases.”
Allah himself tells us there will be other religions such as Judaism and Christianity even until the day of Judgement.
“And the Jews say, “The hand of Allah is chained.” Chained are their hands, and cursed are they for what they say. Rather, both His hands are extended; He spends however He wills. And that which has been revealed to you from your Lord will surely increase many of them in transgression and disbelief. And We have cast among them animosity and hatred until the Day of Resurrection.” (Qur’an 5:64)
“And from those who say, “We are Christians” We took their covenant; but they forgot a portion of that of which they were reminded. So, We caused among them animosity and hatred until the Day of Resurrection. And Allah is going to inform them about what they used to do.” (Qur’an 5:14)
Again, there is no such concept of Islam waging offensive wars to wipe out all other faiths when Allah (swt) himself told us those faiths would not only exist until the day of judgement but different sects among them would exist.
Muslims should be doing daw’ah to invite people to Islam. First, we need to invite ourselves to Islam. Let me ask you brother Suleiman. When is the last time these people performed witr prayer? What about Tahhajud? How much of the Qur’an do they have committed to memory? Are they good to their families? Are they good to their parents?
“My question is that: is it obligatory upon Muslims to wage offensive Jihad and establish the system of Islam on all the world? If no, kindly answer how to respond to above queries then? if yes, then how we respond to the common allegation of atheists against religion that religion only causes war. We can see it in Gaza what Jews are doing to muslims. What hindus are doing to Muslims in India. If muslims also start attacking non-muslim countries and suppose christians also start attacking other countries then where is world peace? There will only be terror and chaos in the world. My second question is that if global jihad is obligatory then how come we can convince non-muslims to accept Islam in this age and time by forcefully occupying their lands? they will only start to have extreme contempt for muslims and nothing else even if we establish the greatest social system in the world? isn’t it also open flood gates of atheism in the muslim world when young generation see non-muslims forced to pay jizya tax while also being humiliated while giving it, non-muslims not allowed to practise their faith openly even in their own countries, certain laws also forced on non-muslims in their countries even if they are allowed to do so in their religion?”
kindly answer my queries, i want to learn about this topic in detail. Kindly suggest me books, articles, youtube videos and other material that can be helpful in my journey but it must be in english.
Jazak Allah
There is no Islamic Imamate at the present time. None. Muslims like any other people have the right to defend themselves. This includes Palestinians, the Rohingya in Myanmar, Uyghurs in China, or Muslims who come under persecution in India, or any where else. Right now, when you have Muslims who hate someone because they are Baluchi, or Pathan or Punjabi or would not let their daughter marry someone because they are from Africa, or another tribe we HAVE A LOT OF WORK TO DO. Why conqueror the world when we ourselves are a huge mess?
AOA, I hope you are doing fine.
“AOA Sulemain, Muslims today are not even praying five times a day, brushing their teeth, waking up for tahhajud, performing witr, and many of them love listening to haram music and watching haram television shows. Wha tis their obsession with outward projection of power when we ourselves are in such a corrupt state and condition?”
These friends of mine pray five times a day, don’t listen to music at all, and also refrain from many other sins. we as humans are fallible so they do sometimes commit sins. They want to change first on individual level, then on community level, local level, national level and then global level.
“I do not know about this concept of ‘Rightly Guided Caliphs” because the companions themselves did not have such a concept. The concept sounds like a counter to Shi’a concepts of infallible Imams. The companions themselves revolted against Uthman and the companions themselves fought against Ali, and the companions themselves broke from Ali when he made the decision for arbitration at Siffin. So, I have no idea where they got this “rightly guided” business from. In terms of them waging offensive wars of conquest just because. I also have no idea where they got this concept from.”
well where i am from majority of population is sunni and so am i. My main concern is not with the term rightly guided caliphs but with on what basis their offensive jihad decision was based on. “In terms of them waging offensive wars of conquest just because. I also have no idea where they got this concept from.” I didn’t understand what you wanted to say. kindly elaborate it again in different wording.
“2.) I am not sure if the 4 rightly guided Caliphs also attacked empires to whom no letter was written by the Holy Prophet PBUH. if yes, how proponents of defensive jihad justify this act? These empires were not attacking muslims and no letters were written to them.”
I would most likely need more elaboration on this point.
I meant that did the first four Caliphs also attacked empires other than Persian and Byzantine? Because there is a viewpoint among some scholars that only those empires were attacked by the first four Caliphs to whom the Prophet PBUH written letters, so they say global Jihad is not part of Islam. Now if the first four Caliphs did attacked other empires then there point becomes null and void. I wanted your opinion on this point of view of some scholars.
Allah himself tells us there will be other religions such as Judaism and Christianity even until the day of Judgement.
“And the Jews say, “The hand of Allah is chained.” Chained are their hands, and cursed are they for what they say. Rather, both His hands are extended; He spends however He wills. And that which has been revealed to you from your Lord will surely increase many of them in transgression and disbelief. And We have cast among them animosity and hatred until the Day of Resurrection.” (Qur’an 5:64)
“And from those who say, “We are Christians” We took their covenant; but they forgot a portion of that of which they were reminded. So, We caused among them animosity and hatred until the Day of Resurrection. And Allah is going to inform them about what they used to do.” (Qur’an 5:14)
Again, there is no such concept of Islam waging offensive wars to wipe out all other faiths when Allah (swt) himself told us those faiths would not only exist until the day of judgement but different sects among them would exist.
Muslims should be doing daw’ah to invite people to Islam. First, we need to invite ourselves to Islam. Let me ask you brother Suleiman. When is the last time these people performed witr prayer? What about Tahhajud? How much of the Qur’an do they have committed to memory? Are they good to their families? Are they good to their parents?
No, what i meant by not allowing other deens in the world was that they should not have any power to execute the rules based upon their deens on this world. My friends say that only the rule of Allah should be followed all around the world and not those of Christianity, Judaism, secularism etc. as a group of people of different faiths they should be allowed to exist and follow their faith in private and behind closed doors. My friends are of good character, they are also studying Tafsir and Biography of Prophet’s PBUH life. They are mostly inspired by the salafi interpretation of Islam but they also reject Salafi rulings on some issues
There is no Islamic Imamate at the present time. None. Muslims like any other people have the right to defend themselves. This includes Palestinians, the Rohingya in Myanmar, Uyghurs in China, or Muslims who come under persecution in India, or any where else. Right now, when you have Muslims who hate someone because they are Baluchi, or Pathan or Punjabi or would not let their daughter marry someone because they are from Africa, or another tribe we HAVE A LOT OF WORK TO DO. Why conqueror the world when we ourselves are a huge mess?
I wholeheartedly agree with you, so do my friends but the ultimate question is that If a perfect Imamate/Caliphate exists tomorrow, will it be obligatory on muslims to conquer the whole world? will offensive jihad obligatory then? do we have to take jizyah from non-muslims? do we have to humiliate them while taking the jizya? if yes then kindly answer my above questions, if no then also answer my above questions. Also suggest me literature on this issue from some great moderate sources in english that I can read so that I can understand this issue in detail.
AOA, Al hamdulillah,
Sulemain I believe that much of this discussion can be convoluted and not helpful for the average day to day Muslim.
So let me give you a brief reply. You see the state of the Muslim Ummah. You see that even in Pakistan the divisions that are there.
So let us 1) make sure that we as individuals are doing our level best to follow the Qur’an and Sunnah.
2) Let us spread love among each other. How? By spreading the salaam.
3) Let us see start with out own families, and then seeing how we can help our communities flourish.
4) Let us see how we can help our individual countries flourish and implement Islam both the outward (dress code, penal code) and the inward, (shyness, kindness, love, mercy, compassion, not being jealous, hateful, vengeful, miserly, stingy, racist, tribal) etc….
I believe we start here there are good things to follow.
My apologies if these are not the answers you are looking for.
All the best.