Are Sunni sources correct that we don’t have the entire Qur’an with us?

And recite that which hath been revealed unto you of the Scripture of thy Lord. There is none who can change His words, and you will find no refuge beside Him. (Qur’an 18:27)

“We have, without doubt, sent down the Message; and We will assuredly guard it.” (Qur’an 15:9)

It is for us to assemble it and to promulgate it. And when we have promulgated it, follow thou its recital (as promulgated). Nay more, it is for us to explain it.” (Qur’an 75:17-19)

“It is not you who slew them; it was Allah: when you threw , it was not your act, but Allah’s: in order that He might test the Believers by a gracious trial from Himself: for Allah is He Who hears and knows (all things). (Qur’an 8:17)

﷽ 

Perhaps one of the most fundamental things that sets the Ahl Haqq Wal Istiqama (The People of Truth and Steadfastness) is the issue of the integrity of the sacred sources. None more important than the foundation of our faith, the Qur’an.

One can say they love the Blessed Messenger (saw) with every fiber of their beings. One can say they are defenders and vanguard of the Sunnah of the Blessed Messenger (saw). However, all of that is an absolute façade if one cannot defend the integrity of the foundation of our faith; namely the Qur’an.

In fact one Sunni apologist whom is known for mostly engaging with Shi’i made a video exclaiming that the fact that chapters of the Qur’an were forgotten and the fact that people forgot it was a proof for it’s veracity and integrity! Can you Imagine!

This article is written to refute the very dangerous assertion by those sources of the Sunni denomination whom proclaim that the Qur’an that Muslims have today does not have the entirety of the Qur’an with in it!

Those particular sources of the Sunni denomination lead us to the following conclusions:

a) There are large portions of the Qur’an that are simply missing (because they were forgotten)!

b) There is some Qur’an that is not in the Qur’an that Muslims have today.

c) The Qur’an abrogates (over rides/cancels) other parts of the Qur’an.

d) That c leads to the concept of redundant revelation.

The position of such people that believe these concepts and sources are an accurate portrayal of our faith is that we do not have the whole of the Qur’an today but we simply have the Qur’an that Allah (swt) intended us to have. Read that again because such a position is extremely nuanced and slippery.

Before I begin I would like to say that I would consider myself a fairly open minded Muslim. I would also consider myself able to accept a wide range of opinions and views with in the Islamic tradition.

However, when it comes to anyone trying to undermine the revelation of the Qur’an and thus undermine Islam in the process I am not open to such a position. It is without doubt a major redline.

In fact when some of the early scholars were writing text on issues of creed I do not see how they left out this most important issue; namely that the total Qur’an has come down to us without being tampered with, intact, guarded, preserved.

I do not compromise on the position that the Qur’an is 100% complete. Now those scholars of the Sunni denomination may allege that I misrepresent their position.

They will claim that they too believe that the Qur’an is 100% complete and at the same time they will affirm all of the oral traditions below. This tongue and cheek approach is anything but sincere.  I believe in what Allah has said in the Qur’an.

1) Allah will guard the Qur’an.

2) None can change Allah’s words

3) Allah will collect, propagate and distribute the Qur’an.

4) Nothing Allah (swt) revealed is redundant.

The Qur’an itself claims it is easy to remember and itself is called the dhikr, that which is remembered, recalled.

“And We have certainly made the Quran easy to remember. So is there anyone who will be mindful?” (Qur’an 54:17)

“This (is) a Reminder. And indeed, for the righteous surely, is a good place of return.” (Qur’an 38: 49) 

So imagine that Allah (swt) has said the Qur’an is easy to remember and even calls the Qur’an something that is recalled. Yet, these people want to claim that even the Blessed Messenger (saw) forgot his revelation.

They will often cite the following as evidence:

“We will have you recite ˹the Quran, O  Prophet,˺ so you will not forget ˹any of it˺, unless Allah wills otherwise. He surely knows what is open and what is hidden.” (Qur’an 87: 6-7)

Some of the detractors focus on the part “unless Allah wills”.

First, it is important to understand that Allah’s will is not like a human will. If a human being wills something today that person may change their mind tomorrow, and when tomorrow comes they may again adopt a completely different idea.

Because exception by the Will of Allah comes in the Word of Allah to emphasize that what is reported happens by His Will (not otherwise). If he wills the opposite of that, it will be so. When Allah (swt) says that something happens if He wills it, it is intended to show His power and majesty because He has control over all things.

That is like in His saying, Exalted is He:

“We would have invented against Allah a lie if we returned to your religion after Allah had saved us from it. And it is not for us to return to it except what Allah wills. Our Lord has encompassed all things in knowledge. Upon Allah, we have relied. Our Lord, decide between us and our people in truth, and You are the best of those who give a decision.” (Qur’an 7:89)

We can see the phrase: ‘Except what Allah wills‘ above.

Does anyone think for a moment that the will of Allah (swt) that people leave Islam for their previous religion? Does anyone think, ‘Well you know there may be exceptions were Allah wants people to leave Islam and practice Shirk again!‘. It is an absolutely ridiculous idea.

Another example:

Certainly, has Allah showed to His Messenger the vision in truth. You will certainly enter al-Masjid al-Haram, if Allah wills, in safety, with your heads shaved and hair shortened, not fearing anyone. He knew what you did not know and has arranged before that a conquest near at hand.” (Qur’an 48:27)   

This verse cannot be construed that Allah (swt) will ‘change his mind‘ as Allah (swt) has already given his decision on this matter: “You will CERTAINLY enter.” 

Another example:

He will say, “The Fire is your residence, wherein you will abide eternally, except for what Allah wills. Indeed, your Lord is Wise and Knowing.” (Qur’an 6:128)

People use this to try and argue that people will not remain in the hellfire forever.

This is also clear from the following text:

“They would desire to go forth from the fire, and they shall not go forth from it, and they shall have a lasting punishment.” (Qur’an 5:37)

“Surely as for those who reject Our communications and turn away from them haughtily, the doors of heaven shall not be opened for them, nor shall they enter the garden until the camel pass through the eye of the needle; and thus do We reward the guilty.” (Qur’an 7:40)

So as we have seen ‘Except what Allah wills‘ can be seen as a rhetorical device.

They will also bring the following as evidence:

“We do not abrogate an ayat or cause it to be forgotten except that We bring forth better than it or similar to it. Do you not know that Allah is over all things competent?” (Qur’an 2:106)

They are so certain that the word ‘ayat’ is used for the Qur’an itself rather than previous revelations or even miracles for that matter.

“There is no changing in the words of Allah.” (Qur’an 10:64)

So what about those who say what about the previous revelations? I have an article on that and Allah (swt) clearly told us in the Qur’an whom was responsible for safeguarding the previous revelations:

“Verily, It is We Who have sent down the Dhikr (the Qur’an) and surely, We will guard it (from corruption) .” (Qur’an 15:9)

“…and the rabbis and the priest (judged according to their Scriptures), FOR TO THEM WAS ENTRUSTED THE PROTECTION OF THE BOOK OF ALLAH, and they were witnesses to it.” (Qur’an 5:44)

For those interested you may read my article: Is the Bible the Unadulterated Word of God?

https://primaquran.com/2022/10/04/is-the-bible-the-unadulterated-word-of-god/

So let us look at the claims contained with in Sunni sources.

The claims of Sayuti have mostly not been translated into English but remain in Arabic and other language sources.

The great Sunni Imam Sayuti claims records that

“It is reported from Ismail ibn Ibrahim from Ayyub from Naafi from Ibn Umar who said: “Let none of you say ‘I have full knowledge of the Quran’. How could he know what full knowledge of it is when much of the Quran has passed by him! Rather, let him say ‘I have acquired of the Qur’an that which is present.’”.

Source: (As-Suyuti, AlItqan fii Ulum al-Quran page 524)

‘A’isha (Allah be pleased with, her) reported that it had been revealed in the Qur’an that ten clear sucklings make the marriage unlawful, then it was abrogated (and substituted) by five sucklings and Allah’s Apostle (may peace be upon him) died and it was before that time (found) in the Qur’an (and recited by the Muslims).

Source: https://sunnah.com/muslim:1452a

Abu Harb b. Abu al-Aswad reported on the authority of his father that Abu Musa al-Ash’ari sent for the reciters of Basra. They came to him and they were three hundred in number. They recited the Qur’an and he said:

You are the best among the inhabitants of Basra, for you are the reciters among them. So continue to recite it. (But bear in mind) that your reciting for a long time may not harden your hearts as were hardened the hearts of those before you. We used to recite a surah which resembled in length and severity to (Surah) Bara’at. I have, however, forgotten it with the exception of this which I remember out of it:” If there were two valleys full of riches, for the son of Adam, he would long for a third valley, and nothing would fill the stomach of the son of Adam but dust.And we used so recite a surah which resembled one of the surahs of Musabbihat, and I have forgotten it, but remember (this much) out of it:” Oh people who believe, why do you say that which you do not practice” (lxi 2.) and” that is recorded in your necks as a witness (against you) and you would be asked about it on the Day of Resurrection” (xvii. 13).

Source: (https://sunnah.com/muslim:1050)

Abu Waqid al-Laithii said, “When the messenger of Allah (saw) received the revelation we would come to him and he would teach us what had been revealed. (I came) to him and he said ‘It was suddenly communicated to me one day: Verily Allah says, We sent down wealth to maintain prayer and deeds of charity, and if the son of Adam had a valley he would leave it in search for another like it and, if he got another like it, he would press on for a third, and nothing would satisfy the stomach of the son of Adam but dust, yet Allah is relenting towards those who relent.”

Source: (As-Suyuti, Al-Itqan fii Ulum al-Qur’an , p.525).

We used to recite a surah similar to one of the Musabbihaat, and I no longer remember it but this much I have indeed preserved: ‘O you who truly believe why do you preach that which you do not practice?’ (and) ‘that is inscribed on your necks as a witness and you will be examined about it on the Day of Resurrection.’ 

Source: (as-Suyuti, Al-Itqan fii Ulum al-Qur’an, p.526).

“Yahya related to me from Malik from Zayd ibn Aslam from al-Qaqa ibn Hakim that Abu Yunus, the mawla of A’isha, umm al-muminin said, “A’isha ordered me to write out a Qur’an for her. She said, ‘When you reach this ayat, let me know, “Guard the prayers carefully and the middle prayer and stand obedient to Allah.”‘ When I reached it I told her, and she dictated to me, ‘Guard the prayers carefully and the middle prayer and the asr prayer and stand obedient to Allah.’ A’isha said, ‘I heard it from the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace.'”

Source: https://sunnah.com/malik/8/27

“Yahya related to me from Malik from Zayd ibn Aslam that Amr ibn Rafi said, “I was writing a Qur’an for Hafsa, umm al-muminin, and she said, ‘When you reach this ayat, let me know, “Guard the prayers carefully and the middle prayer and stand obedient to Allah.”‘ When I reached it I told her and she dictated to me, ‘Guard the prayers carefully and the middle prayer and the asr prayer and stand obedient to Allah.”

Source: (Malik’s Muwatta, Book 8, Number 8.8.27)

Prima Qur’an comments:

Let me ask you my Muslim brothers and sisters when you open up the Qur’an do you find “Guard the prayers carefully and the middle prayer and the asr prayer and stand obedient to Allah.” ?

https://www.islamawakened.com/index.php/qur-an  (just in case you do not have a Qur’an with you) Now for me the above are less serious as they can easily be attributed to a scribal error. People would often sit for long sessions taking information and transcribing. So I do not find the above to be truly problematic. However, it is a glaring reality that lone narrator reports do not necessarily convey absolute certainty.

Narrated Ibn `Abbas:

`Umar said, “I am afraid that after a long time has passed, people may say, “We do not find the Verses of the Rajam (stoning to death) in the Holy Book,” and consequently they may go astray by leaving an obligation that Allah has revealed. Lo! I confirm that the penalty of Rajam be inflicted on him who commits illegal sexual intercourse, if he is already married and the crime is proved by witnesses or pregnancy or confession.” Sufyan added, “I have memorized this narration in this way.” `Umar added, “Surely Allah’s Messenger (saw) carried out the penalty of Rajam, and so did we after him.”

Source: (https://sunnah.com/bukhari:6829)

Zirr ibn Hubaish reported: “Ubayy ibn Ka’b said to me, ‘What is the extent of Suratul-Ahzab? ‘I said, ‘Seventy or seventy-three verses’. He said, ‘Yet it used to be equal to Suratul-Baqarah and in it we recited the verse of stoning’. I said, ‘And what is the verse of stoning’? He replied, ‘The fornicators among the married men ( ash-shaikh)) and married women (ash-shaikhah), stone them as an exemplary punishment from Allah, and Allah is Mighty and Wise.”‘

Source: (As-Suyuti, Al-Itqan fii Ulum al-Qur’an , p.524).

The other issue is that scholars of the Sunni have adopted a theological position which states that the Qur’an is eternal.

You can see another Sunni Muslim apologist outline that position below.

http://sunnianswers.wordpress.com/2012/08/17/clarity-on-the-different-sayings-about-the-quraan/

Why I bring this up is that the Sunni Muslim scholars hold to the doctrine of abrogation.

So now we have a Qur’an that is both eternal that contains verses that abrogate each other?

Welcome to the very weird theological position of eternal abrogation!  This is as weird a theological position as the Christian claim of ‘eternally begotten’.   How are you going to be eternal and begotten at the same time?  How is the Qur’an going to be eternal and abrogated simultaneously?  Odd, very odd indeed.

How could you have an eternal perfect revelation that is at the same time replaced by other eternal revelation that is either similar to or superior than it?

But this is where it gets very messy.

I could very well see them making the counter claim.  “No brother you see all the verses are eternal, what you don’t understand is that they were revealed in different sequences.”

Yet, the Allah (swt) says in the Qur’an:

“Do they not consider the Qur’an (with care)? Had it been from other Than Allah, they would surely have found therein Much discrepancy.” (Qur’an 4:82)

The idea that the Qur’an would contain eternal redundant revelation is both blasphemous and cause for pensive reflection

Prima Qur’an Conclusion:

The ideas that the sources of the Sunni denomination are propagating that the Qur’an does not contain the entire Qur’an I feel greatly undermines the preservation, and veracity of the text of the Qur’an.

Perhaps more than any other view on aqidah it is this belief that separates the Ibadi perspective from that of the Sunni perspective (with dissenting voices) as mentioned.

It puts the ultimate weapon in the hands of the detractors of faith to tear down the entirety of Islam.

The sources of the Sunni denomination have no moral ground, and in fact no justification to lift a pen in the defense of Islam, do a radio or television program, or write an article or book  to defend this great faith because it is all done in vain.

Why on Earth Princess Leia would hand over plans to the death star to the empire, and than claim she has the best interest of the rebellion at heart is beyond me!

As a follow up I need to write an entry for the following. (Allah-willing)

a) showing the problematic nature of believing the Qur’an to be eternal.

https://primaquran.com/2023/04/09/the-quran-is-created-4/

b) refuting the idea that the Qur’an abrogates itself.

https://primaquran.com/2022/10/04/why-abrogation-in-the-quran-is-a-false-doctrine/

I leave you with the supreme words of the Creator.

Those who distort Our revelations are not hidden from Us. Is one who is thrown into Hell better, or one who comes secure on the Day of Resurrection? Do whatever you wish; He is Seer of what you do. Those who have rejected the Reminder when it came to them; and it is an Honorable Book. No falsehood could enter it, presently or afterwards; a revelation from One Most Wise, Praiseworthy. (Qur’an 41:40-42)

Moses said to them: “Woe to you, do not invent lies about God, else the retribution will take you, and miserable is the one who invents.” (Qur’an 20:61)

May Allah Guide the Ummah.

May Allah Forgive the Ummah.

5 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized

5 responses to “Are Sunni sources correct that we don’t have the entire Qur’an with us?

  1. ibnabutalib's avatar ibnabutalib

    I personally find the type of abrogation that involves the abrogation of the verse but not the legal ruling to be highly absurd. With all due respect, what were the medieval scholars thinking? Moreover, how come the scholars can’t agree on the exact verses that have been abrogated? Some say there exists 200 abrogating/abrogated verses, others reduce the number to 5.

    While debating a hardcore Sunni on the issue of abrogation, I was told not to speak about the Quran without knowledge. I then pointed out the varying opinions regarding the number of abrogated verses in Sunni Quranic scholarship, and asked my opponent which scholar had it right? The one who believed the Quran contained 100s of abrogated verses, the one who believed in 5, or the one that didn’t believe in any? Surely they can’t all be right! Thus, some of them must have been speaking without knowledge!

    • Welcome ibnabutalib! “I personally find the type of abrogation that involves the abrogation of the verse but not the legal ruling to be highly absurd.” Absolutely! This is one of the reasons I had to leave the ‘Ahl Sunnah Wal Jammah’ because I was limited to approaching the primary and secondary sources of Islam through juristic approaches that seemed so weird.

      You also make a good point on the number of what is abrogated or abrogating. Allah willing I plan to do an entry on this in the near future. The other interesting point is that we do have traditionalist who did not believe in the concept.

      Too often you will hear that those who deny the Qur’an abrogates the Qur’an are modernist. This is absolutely not true.

  2. Nejdet's avatar Nejdet

    Salaam alaykum brothers,

    I must say that this article is spot on! I personally had many doubts about this matter and had read about so many differences of opinion on the topic of Naskh (abrogation). Like brother ‘ibnabutalib’ says: some say there exists 200 abrogating/abrogated verses, others reduce the number to 5″. Believe it or not, these numbers differ and I find it absolutely absurd that a Qur’anic verse can be abrogate by a hadeeth! You’ve got to be joking! Qur’an is the WORD of ALLAH whereas the hadeeth are REPORTS of people. What one scholar deems Sahih (authentic), another scholar deems it Da’eef (weak).

    And the suggestion that the Qur’an has missing verses is even more absurd! Sheikh Imran Hosein explains this perfectly by saying ” NONE of the verses of the Qur’an have been abrogated or caused to be forgotten. But what Allah is referring to is PREVIOUS revelations (Zaboor, Torah, Injeel).”

    Salaam 🙂

  3. Nuhu Osman Attah's avatar uthmanibnsabeel

    Imam Suyuti’s Itqan contains unfounded statements (Allah knows best) in that there is no recognizable chain to much of it. Also the Companions used to write tafsir in their personal copies of the Qur’an (this includes appending to the Quranic text itself). If you read the two traditions of the asr salat in that light, it should make sense. Regarding the son of Adam and the valley of gold issue, a few companions thought it was part of the Qur’an, but the rest assured them it wasn’t and the Prophet (saw) had Normandy written in the codices). And Allah knows best.

  4. Nuhu Osman Attah's avatar uthmanibnsabeel

    *had not had it (not Normandy)

Leave a reply to Nejdet Cancel reply