Tag Archives: companions

The time Al Abbas called Ali Ibn Abu Talib a sinful, treacherous, deceitful liar.

“O believers! Stand firm for justice as witnesses for Allah even if it is against yourselves, your parents, or close relatives. Be they rich or poor, Allah is best to ensure their interests. So do not let your desires cause you to deviate . If you distort the testimony or refuse to give it, then Allah is certainly All-Aware of what you do.” (Qur’an 4:135)

Imagine you happend upon someone calling Ali Ibn Abu Talib a sinful treacherous deceitful liar what would cross your mind? Would we call this person a Nasibi? Would we call this person a hypocrite? A vile sinner?

Well, where we come from we call such a person, a member of Banu Hashim, Uncle to the Prophet, thaer of Ibn Abbas the scholar of the Qur’an, none other than Al Abbas (ra).

It is reported by Zuhri that this tradition was narrated to him by Malik b. Aus who said:

Umar b. al-Khattab sent for me and I came to him when the day had advanced. I found him in his house sitting on his bare bed-stead, reclining on a leather pillow. He said (to me): Malik, some people of your tribe have hastened to me (with a request for help). I have ordered a little money for them. Take it and distribute it among them. I said: I wish you had ordered somebody else to do this job. He said: Malik, take it (and do what you have been told). At this moment (his man-servant) Yarfa’ came in and said: Commander of the Faithful, what do you say about Uthman, Abd al-Rabman b. ‘Auf, Zubair and Sa’d (who have come to seek an audience with you)? He said: Yes, and permitted them. so they entered. Then he (Yarfa’) came again and said: What do you say about ‘Ali and Abbas (who are present at the door)? He said: Yes, and permitted them to enter. Abbas said: Commander of the Faithful, decide (the dispute) between me and this sinful, treacherous, dishonest liar. The people (who were present) also said: Yes. Commander of the Faithful, do decide (the dispute) and have mercy on them. Malik b. Aus said: I could well imagine that they had sent them in advance for this purpose (by ‘Ali and Abbas). ‘Umar said: Wait and be patient. I adjure you by Allah by Whose order the heavens and the earth are sustained, don’t you know that the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) said:” We (prophets) do not have any heirs; what we leave behind is (to be given in) charity”? They said: Yes. Then he turned to Abbas and ‘Ali and said: I adjure you both by Allah by Whose order the heavens and earth are sustained, don’t you know that the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) said:” We do not have any heirs; what we leave behind is (to be given in) charity”? They (too) said: Yes. (Then) Umar said: Allah, the Glorious and Exalted, had done to His Messenger (ﷺ) a special favour that He has not done to anyone else except him. He quoted the Qur’anic verse:” What Allah has bestowed upon His Apostle from (the properties) of the people of township is for Allah and His Messenger”. The narrator said: I do not know whether he also recited the previous verse or not. Umar continued: The Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) distrbuted among you the properties abandoned by Banu Nadir. By Allah, he never preferred himself over you and never appropriated anything to your exclusion. (After a fair distribution in this way) this property was left over. The Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) would meet from its income his annual expenditure, and what remained would be deposited in the Bait-ul-Mal. (Continuing further) he said: I adjure you by Allah by Whose order the heavens and the earth are sustained. Do you know this? They said: Yes. Then he adjured Abbas and ‘All as he had adjured the other persons and asked: Do you both know this? They said: Yes. He said: When the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) passed away, Abu Bakr said:” I am the successor of the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ).” Both of you came to demand your shares from the property (left behind by the Messenger of Allah). (Referring to Hadrat ‘Abbas), he said: You demanded your share from the property of your nephew, and he (referring to ‘Ali) demanded a share on behalf of his wife from the property of her father. Abu Bakr (Allah be pleased with him) said: The Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) had said:” We do not have any heirs; what we leave behind is (to be given in) charity.” So both of you thought him to be a liar, sinful, treacherous and dishonest. And Allah knows that he was true, virtuous, well-guided and a follower of truth. When Abu Bakr passed away and (I have become) the successor of the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) and Abu Bakr (Allah be pleased with him), you thought me to be a liar, sinful, treacherous and dishonest. And Allah knows that I am true, virtuous, well-guided and a follower of truth. I became the guardian of this property. Then you as well as he came to me. Both of you have come and your purpose is identical. You said: Entrust the property to us. I said: If you wish that I should entrust it to you, it will be on the condition that both of you will undertake to abide by a pledge made with Allah that you will use it in the same way as the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) used it. So both of you got it. He said: Wasn’t it like this? They said: Yes. He said: Then you have (again) come to me with the request that I should adjudge between you. No, by Allah. I will not give any other judgment except this until the arrival of the Doomsday. If you are unable to hold the property on this condition, return it to me.

Source: (https://sunnah.com/muslim:1757c)

The above hadith is an indication that the companions were people just like anyone else. They could be petty and had disputes with each other, called each other names and as we all know at one point in history killed one another.

فَقَالَ عَبَّاسٌ: يَا أَمِيرَ الْمُؤْمِنِينَ اقْضِ بَيْنِي وَبَيْنَ هَذَا – الْكَاذِبِ الآثِمِ الْغَادِرِ الْخَائِنِ.

So Al Abbas said: “O Commander of the Faithful, judge between me and this one – the liar, the sinful, the treacherous, the deceitful.”

Umar Ibn Al Khattab (ra) did not object to this statement. Others that were said to be present:

Uthman ibn Affan. Abd Al-Rahman ibn Awf & Al-Zubayr ibn al-Awwan.

The Abbasid Sunni Muslims who are the bulk of the Sunni Muslims today are those who underwent a Shi’ification. Go bring this narration to your teachers and watch how they react! They panic out over such statements. Whereas the original Sunni Muslims, the Umayyad Sunnis had no problems with such narrations. The proof of this is that this is one of the narrations of al-Zuhri, who was an Umayyad and one of the elders of the Umayyad court.The Abbasid Sunnis, the bulk of the Sunni Muslims today, will say about the statement of Al Abbas. “The statement is not befitting of him.” However, the chain is sound, and thus elaborate interpretative measures are deployed. They even go so far as to admit that the people of the past would remove such statements from the copies of their books. It has nothing to do with the truth and everything to do with the doctrine they contrived: Adalah al-Sahabah.

If only we could be honest with ourselves and honest with our history. 

In the Khutba the Khatib says:

…وَعَلَى آلِهِ وَصَحْبِهِ أَجْمَعِينَ
…wa ‘ala aalihi wa sahbihi ajma’een.

Which means upon the people of Muhammed (saw) and companions. So to this we say amin. Because it is generic and general.

This is exactly the position of the angels.

“Those (angels) who bear the Throne and those around it glorify the praises of their Lord, and believe in Him, and ask forgiveness for those who believe (saying): ‘Our Lord! You comprehend all things in mercy and knowledge, so forgive those who repent and follow Your Way, and save them from the torment of the blazing Fire! Our Lord! And make them enter the Paradise which you have promised them, and to the righteous among their fathers, their wives, and their offspring! Verily, You are the All-Mighty, the All-Wise. And save them from the sins, and whomsoever You save from the sins that Day, him verily, You have taken into mercy.” And that is the supreme success.’” (Qur’an 40: 7-9)

Those. Those. Them. Them. Their. Their. Their. Them. Whomsoever. All very generic and general. Because at the end of the day Allah (swt) knows best who dies upon Islam.

We can apply this in every situation and absolutely safeguard our faith. This goes for those of you who are Muslim converts or those of you who are looking into Islam. The testimony of faith is to bear witness that Allah is the one and only God. That Muhammed (peace be upon him) is his last and final messenger.

As regards to the politics and the events of the past.

“That was a community that had already gone before. For them is what they earned and for you is what you have earned. And you will not be accountable for what they have done.” (Qur’an 2:141)

From the questions one will be asked in the grave:

  • The Questions:
    1. Rabbu-ka? (Who is your Lord?)
    2. Ma Deenu-ka? (What is your religion?)
    3. Man Nabiyyu-ka? (Who is your Prophet? / Or what did you say about Muhammed?)

The angels are not asking you about the companions and your affiliation or dissociation with any of them.

Then the day of judgement. That awesome and terrifying day.

You will then be presented ˹before Him for judgment˺, and none of your secrets will stay hidden. (Qur’an 69:18)

One thing Allah (swt) already exhonerated us from is about what people in the past did. Al hamdulillah! Allah is the Most Merciful!

“That was a community that had already gone before. For them is what they earned and for you is what you have earned. And you will not be accountable for what they have done.” (Qur’an 2:141)

Today there are is much writing about what are claimed to be Nasibi tendencies in our books of history and even in the hadith narrations. Yet, no one speaks about on the censorship and the injustice did to the umayyad clan. Surely they did injustice themselves by the Abbasids were no angels.

“Fight in the cause of Allah ˹only˺ against those who wage war against you, but do not exceed the limits. Allah does not like transgressors.” (Qur’an 2:190)

Systematically wiping out entire bloodlines is certainly exceeding the limits.

Abd al-Rahman ibn Mu’awiya the founder of the Umayyad dynasty in Al-Andalus was helped in his escape by the friendly Ibadi Nafza Berber tribes. This inspite of the conflict the Ibadis had with the Umayyads. However, Ibadis are not people who go beyond the limits. No Muslim should go beyond thelimits. In fact, he (Abd-al Rahman ibn Mu’awiya) received support from the Ibadis. Beyond the help from these village communities. 

Our school simply does not like bullies. Whoever they are and whatever form they take at the time. Yesterday’s monster is now today’s vulnerable individual. 

“Non-Ibadi historians mentioned these delegates to Umar bin Abdul-Aziz, though they said with their usual insinuation: “The Khawarij sent him a delegation.” However, they did not mention what happened between them and the Caliph Umar and his acceptance of all their suggestions about spreading justice and purging the country of the Umayyad tradition of cursing Ali from the pulpit. The Ibadi delegation said to Umar, “Muslims are cursing from pulpits in mosques, so this evil tradition must be changed.” Thus, Umar replaced it with the words of Allah: ‘

“Indeed, Allah orders justice and good conduct and giving to relatives and forbids immorality and bad conduct and oppression. He admonishes you that you remember.” (Qur’an 16: 90)

This is a legacy of the Ibadi school that is found in a Friday Khutba in Sunni Masjids all over the world.

A powerful verse and a reminder to the entire Ummah.

May Allah Forgive the Ummah.

May Allah Guide the Ummah.

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

al-walāya (allegiance) and al-barā’a (disavowal) with the companions and other matters.

“My Lord! Increase me in knowledge.” (Qur’an 20:114)

﷽ 

We have the principle of al-walāya (allegiance) and al-barā’a (disavowal), which are either general or specific. The  specificity is either established by truth through a text from the Book of Allah and direct hearing from the Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him. Or apparent through observation, acknowledgment, testimony of just witnesses, or evident truth supported by proof. If someone’s status is unclear, one should refrain from including them in al-walāya or al-barā’a. No one is definitively assigned to Paradise or Hell except those who are in the state of true allegiance and true disavowal, as established by a text from the Book of Allah and direct hearing from the Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him.

The Companions and others are equal in this principle, except that the default for the Companions is al-walāya (allegiance) only.

Allah’s rulings encompass everyone, and no one is above the ruling of Allah Almighty.

The status of the companions of the Blessed Prophet (saw).

The position of our school is not in agreement with those who call themselves the people of the Sunnah. Their position is that all the companions are considered just and righteous.

However, our school is not built upon the praise of anyone other than the Blessed Prophet (saw). Nor is it built upon the cursing of anyone other than Iblis and his minions.

We can console ourselves with the noble verse of the Qur’an:

“That is a nation which has passed on. It will have [the consequence of] what it earned, and you will have what you have earned. And you will not be asked about what they used to do.” (Qur’an 2:141)

For the layperson and the laity, the default position is one of wuqoof. This means pausing or to stop on anyone we are not certain of.  It is based upon insufficient data. This is the position of the vast majority of people in our school, as the vast majority are the laity. 

That is to say they are in wuqoof with all those companions in which there is some dispute about their status in our school. Uthman, Ali, Talha, Zubayr, for example. 

They need not concern themselves with these disputes that happened among the companions. However, the scholars or those who have studied under them take various positions based upon what they gather is sufficient data. That sufficient data may lead them to disavow a companion or to put a companion in guardianship.

What is also important is that everyone in our school ascribes to general friendship as well as general dissociation. So, no matter the conclusions we reach based upon apparent evidence, our friendship or dissociation is with people based upon reality.

What does this mean in a practical sense? 

Example 1

You put person A in Bara’ah based upon some apparent evidence. Based upon the current condition of person A. 

However, since you declared the Walayah al-Jumlah and that person had a good ending, they are in wilayah with you in reality.  

You made an ijtihad based upon the conditions of the person that were apparent to you at the time. However, you made a declaration based upon the reality of a person’s condition with Allah (swt).

Example 2 

You put person A in Walayah based upon some apparent evidence. Based upon the current condition of person A. 

However, since you declared the Bara’ah al-Jumlah and that person had a bad ending, they are in bara’ah with you in reality.  

You made an ijtihad based upon the conditions of the person that were apparent to you at the time. However, you made a declaration based upon the reality of a person’s conditon with Allah (swt).

How to declare the intention for the general wilayah and the general bara’ah?

Walayah al-Jumlah – The general or common friendship.

One declares (you reading this can declare now.) “I ally with every single person among mankind and jinn who ever lived or ever will live that has died righteous.”

Bara’ah al-Jumlah – The general or common dissociation.

One declares (you reading this can declare now.) “I disown every person among mankind and jinn whoever lived or ever will live that will be among the denizens of hellfire.”

It is to say in your heart: Anybody Allah loves, I love him. Anyone whom Allah hates, I hate them. 

Thus, if Uthman, Ali, Talha, Zubayr fall into either category, we have already declared our walāya with them or a barā’a of them based upon reality. The reality overrides the apparent. And this is well known in our school. As well as the position of those who are students of knowledge is that of wuqoof.

How many are those who declare with their tongues that which is not in their hearts?

“They were closer to disbelief than to belief on that day—for saying with their mouths what was not in their hearts. Allah is All-Knowing of what they hide.” (Qur’an 3:167)

How can an individual be both in walayah and bara’ah with the righteous?

Possible scenario.

Person A left Gwadar Port. The people of that place know person A to be upright and fair dealing. However, Person A, when he arrives in Port Bell, is known to swindle and cheat people.

The righteous people at Gwadar port judge based upon his outward actions. The righteous at Port Bell judge based upon his outward actions.

The actions of the person in Port Bell never reach the people of Gwadar port.

Walayah and Bara’ah are ultimately not about personal relationships.

Allah is always the focus!

Whether it is a relationship between yourself and another person. Or a relationship between person A and person B. You are neither person A nor person B. 

Example: You have someone who is very close to you. Your mother, your father, or even your child. You love this person. You have familiar ties to that person. However, if this person is a sinner. They would be in bara’ah for the duration of the time they indulge the sin. It has nothing to do with your relationship to them at any given moment and everything to do with their relationship to Allah at any given moment.

Example: There is a tyrant ruler. This tyrant ruler gives everyone their full rights. This person prays the five daily prayers. However, he gets drunk. He drinks alcohol. In this case, do you ally with him or dissociate from him? Even though he treats you well and gives you your full rights. Because he drinks alcohol in that condition, he is an enemy of Allah (swt). He will be so for the duration of the time he spends doing so. Your relationship with this ruler may be cordial, but you disown him because it has nothing to do with your relationship to him at any given moment and everything to do with his/her relationship to Allah at any given moment

Example: A fellow Muslim for whom, whatever reason, you do not like. Human beings can be fickle. Maybe it is the way they laugh or anything at all you personally find fault with.  However, that person prays, fasts and does not commit any sins that you are aware of. No matter your personal feelings towards this person, you must ally with them.  They are in wilaya with you, and you cannot put this person in bara’ah based upon personal feelings or a whim. That is because it has nothing to do with your relationship between you and him at any given moment and everything to do with his/her relationship to Allah at any given moment. 

This is more about recognizing the rights of Allah (swt). Allah (swt) reigns supreme over all his creation.

You might be interested to read our other articles on the subject here:

May Allah Guide the Ummah.

May Allah Forgive the Ummah.

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

The companions were promised paradise in the Qur’an ?

Do not follow what you have no knowledge of. Indeed, all will be called to account for ˹their˺ hearing, sight, and intellect.” (Qur’an 17:36)

﷽ 

“To Allah belongs whatsoever is in the heavens and whatsoever is in the earth, that He may recompense those who do evil for what they have done, and recompense those who have done good (ahsanu) with the reward most fair (bil-hus’na).” (Qur’an 53:31)

The issue of the companions is a sensitive one among the Muslim ummah. Often one dives right into the subject without taking some time to define terms. For example:

Who actually is a companion (sahaba)? What are the criteria that are used?

Is there a universally agreed upon definition?

All of these preliminary questions would be very helpful in establishing the truth of the matter.

So, for us, we do not deal with emotions. We deal with proof and evidence because this is what ultimately establishes truth from error.


The following verses are those that the Sunni Muslims will use to somehow justify that a certain group of the companions are going to paradise. However, we need to do a tight textual analysis to see if this is actually correct.

“And why do you not spend in the cause of Allah while to Allah belongs the heritage of the heavens and the earth? Not equal among you are those who spent before the conquest [of Makkah] and fought [and those who did so after it]. Those are greater in degree than they who spent afterward and fought. But to all Allah has promised reward (l-husna). And Allah, with what you do, is Acquainted.” (Qur’an 57:10)

“Not equal are those believers remaining [at home] – other than the disabled – and the mujahideen, [who strive and fight] in the cause of Allah with their wealth and their lives. Allah has preferred the mujahideen through their wealth and their lives over those who remain [behind], by degrees. And to both Allah has promised reward (l-husna). But Allah has preferred the mujahideen over those who remain [behind] with a greater reward (ajran aziman).” (Qur’an 49:5)

First, neither of these verses are speaking about paradise or promising anyone paradise. Someone will need to show where in the Arabic text it says this.

This is the issue of comparison of deeds. What deeds are more meritorious than the other. This text does not address the issue that all of them will go to paradise.

Allah (swt) differentiates those who do jihad and those who remain at home. Allah (swt) differentiates between those who have spent and fought before and those who came later.

Also, if you juxtapose the two verses together, look at them closely.

The statement: ”With a greater reward (ajran aziman)” cannot mean paradise/heaven.

First, because the Arabic text does not say so.

Second, because it would exclude from paradise those from the statement: “But to all Allah has promised reward (l-husna)” because the verse in 49:5 indicates that ajran aziman is distinct from l-husna.

The only way for Sunni scholars to solve this is for them to use strained interpretative devices to suggest that husna means heaven and ajran aziman means seeing Allah, or that husna means heaven and ajran aziman means greater heaven.

The Qur’an speaks in generality. It speaks in terms of generality. When it speaks of the companions as we see above, it speaks in terms of generality.  Thus, Qur’an 57:10 and Qur’an 49:5 speak in generalities and do not explicitly mention paradise. Therefore, we should not read paradise into those general verses simply because we assume that the recipients as a whole were righteous or guaranteed paradise.

This is methodologically sound. A general promise of al-ḥusnā (the best reward) does not, by itself, constitute an explicit guarantee of paradise for every individual within the groups mentioned, especially when:

  1. The Qur’an itself affirms that hypocrites existed among the Muhājirūn and Anṣār (Qur’an 9:101).
  2. The Prophet (saw) explicitly stated that some of his companions would be barred from his Ḥawḍ (Bukhārī, 6582).
  3. Any creedal claim of universal salvation for all companions requires additional evidence beyond these two verses.

Contrast those verses above where no mention of paradise is in the Arabic text with a text that has explicit mention.

“And their Lord responded to them, “Never will I allow to be lost the work of [any] worker among you, whether male or female; you are of one another. So those who emigrated and were evicted from their homes and were harmed in My cause and fought and were killed – I will surely remove from them their misdeeds, and I will surely admit them to gardens (jannatin) beneath which rivers flow as reward from Allah , and Allah has with Him the best reward.” (Qur’an 3:195)

Notice how Allah (swt) describes those, their, them who receive the gardens(janna)? They are those whom: emigrated, were evicted, harmed, fought and were killed.

Qur’an 3:195 describes a specific group with specific qualities and promises them paradise. It does not say others are excluded, but it also does not authorize us to extend its promise beyond those qualities.

Allah does not cause the loss of anyone who does good.

So, certainly, if anyone does good, they will be rewarded with what is better. And whoever does evil will be rewarded for that. So, if this is the ruling for mankind in general, of course, the believers get reward for good, and it is no secret that in Islam some intentions are more noble than other intentions. Some actions are more meritorious than other actions.

Whoever comes with a good deed will be rewarded with what is better. And whoever comes with an evil deed, then the evildoers will only be rewarded for what they used to do.” (Qur’an 28:84)

“Be patient in hard times.(Oh Muhammed) Allah does not fail to repay those who do good.” (Qur’an 11:115)

Also, keep in mind, based upon the verses in the Qur’an, we know that people who die as a shaheed in the path of Allah (swt) will be in paradise. This is also our good opinion and outward perception. However, only Allah (swt) really knows what is in the heart of people.

“It has been narrated on the authority of Sulaiman b. Yasar who said:

People dispersed from around Abu Huraira, and Natil, who was from the Syrians. said to him: O Shaykh, relate (to us) a tradition you have heard from the Messenger of Allah (saw). He said: Yes. I heard the Messenger of Allah (saw) say: The first of men (whose case) will be decided on the Day of Judgment will be a man who died as a martyr. He shall be brought (before the Judgment Seat). Allah will make him recount His blessings (i. e. the blessings which He had bestowed upon him) and he will recount them (and admit having enjoyed them in his life). (Then) will Allah say: What did you do (to requite these blessings)? He will say: I fought for Thee until I died as a martyr. Allah will say: You have told a lie. You fought that you might be called a” brave warrior”. And you were called so. (Then) orders will be passed against him and he will be dragged with his face downward and cast into Hell.”

Source: (https://sunnah.com/muslim:1905a)

The principles of interpreting the Qur’an are twofold.

When one text is general and another is specific, the specific is regarded as stronger as evidence.

A clear text is preferable to an interpretation of the text.

An example:

Allah (swt) says in the Qur’an:

“In it are Signs Manifest; (for example), the Station of Ibrahim; whoever enters it attains security; Pilgrimage therefore it is a duty mankind (nas) owe to Allah,- those who are able to perform the journey; but if any deny faith, Allah stands not in need of any of His creatures.” (Qur’an 3:97)

Nass (people/mankind) includes children, women, slaves, the insane; all are included in the word nass (people). When it comes to hadith, some are lifted from the obligation. Children must not go on hajj alone. Women must not go unless they have the company of a mahrim. The mentally challenged are not obligated at all. All of those categories are not obligated unless certain conditions are met—even though they are all nass (people, mankind)

For example the companion/sabaha that Allah (swt) called a fasiq.

“O you who believe! If a Fasiq (liar- evil person) comes to you with any news, verify it, lest you should harm people in ignorance, and afterwards you become regretful for what you have done” (Qur’an 49:6)

“And as for those who are Fasiqun (disbelievers and disobedient to Allah), their abode will be the Fire, every time they wish to get away therefrom, they will be put back thereto, and it will be said to them: “Taste you the torment of the Fire which you used to deny.” (Qur’an 32:20)

I said to ‘Ammar: What is your opinion about that which you have done in case (of your siding with Hadrat ‘Ali)? Is it your personal opinion or something you got from Allah’s Messenger (saw)? ‘Ammar said: We have got nothing from Allah’s Messenger (saw) which people at large did not get, but Hudhaifa told me that Allah’s Apostle (saw) had especially told him amongst his Companion, that there would be twelve hypocrites out of whom eight would not get into Paradise, until a camel would be able to pass through the needle hole. The ulcer would be itself sufficient (to kill) eight. So far as four are concerned, I do not remember what Shu’ba said about them.”

Source: (https://sunnah.com/muslim:2779a)

Narrated Anas:

The Prophet (saw) said, “Some of my companions will come to me at my Lake Fount, and after I recognize them, they will then be taken away from me, whereupon I will say, ‘My companions!’ Then it will be said, ‘You do not know what they innovated (new things) in the religion after you.”

Source: (https://sunnah.com/bukhari:6582)

If Umar Ibn Al Khattab (ra) understood the verses of 57:10 and 49:5 in the way contemporary Sunni Muslims strenuously interpret them, then Umar(ra) would not go to Hudhayfah ibn Yaman (ra) and ask if he was a hypocrite.

Now someone will reply: “This is a sign of his sincerity.”

Yes, that is true, but it is a sign of nifaq to doubt a promise of Allah (swt)!

Rather, Umar Ibn Al Khattab (ra) did this because of both. He was not certain of his place in paradise, and he had sincerity and true fear of Allah (swt).

As the following verse reminds us:

“Did they feel secure against Allah’s planning? None would feel secure from Allah’s planning except the losers.” (Qur’an 7:99)

The next set of verses to look at:

“And the vanguard among (min’al) the emigrants and the helpers, and those who followed them in goodness, Allah is well pleased with them and they are well pleased with Him, and He has prepared for them gardens beneath which rivers flow, to abide in them forever; that is the mighty achievement.” And among (min’al) those around you of the Bedouins are hypocrites, and also from the people of Madinah. They have become accustomed to hypocrisy. You do not know them, We know them. We will punish them twice, once in this world; then they will be returned to a great punishment.” (Qur’an 9:100-101)

So when we look at this verse in Arabic and in context we realize a few important points.

This verse starts off with words of praise and reward for the vanguard among the emigrants and the helpers, as well as anyone ‘those‘ who followed them in goodness. They are the subject of Allah’s grace and promise.

So, the first part of the verse is not all the companions who immigrated to Madinah. However, the following verse also makes the first verse clear. ‘And among the Bedouins and people of Madinah.’

So is the second verse saying that all the Bedouins are hypocrites?

Is the second verse saying that all the people of Madinah are hypocrites?

So, when we consider that the Bedouins are people who could have migrated with the Blessed Messenger (saw), they could be among the Muhajirun.

When we consider that the Ansar are from Madinah, they could be from among those in Madinah. However, even after these clear points are presented, there are additional points of consideration.

“And those who came after them say: “Our Lord! Forgive us, and our brethren who came before us into the Faith, and leave not, in our hearts, rancour (or sense of injury) against those who have believed. Our Lord! You are indeed Full of Kindness, Most Merciful.” (Qur’an 59:10)

This very beautiful revelation was revealed as a reminder to the people of Madinah who were receiving the immigrants, the people who were coming from Mecca to join them. Notice the verse does not say, “all those who came before us”. Rather, the verse says, ‘those who have believed.’.

Now, even though this verse was in the context of the Ansar receiving the Mujahirin, we should see no reason why not to apply this verse today for us as Muslims.

We should certainly harbor no ill will from those who came before us who were believers. No one needs to insert words into the text that is not there. There is no problem with praying, “leave not in our hearts rancour against those who believed”, because Allah (swt) knows those who believed and those who did not.

This is an issue of creed (aqidah) for Sunni Muslims, but it is not for our school, Ahl al-Haqq wa-l istiqama

The Sunni Muslims state in Al-Aqidah al-Tahawiyyah.

“We love the companions of the Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him. We do not exaggerate in our love for any of them, nor do we disown any of themWe hate those who hate them or who mention them without good, for we do not mention them except with good. Love for them is a part of religion, faith, and spiritual excellence, and hatred for them is unbelief, hypocrisy, and transgression.”

This is the Sunni statement of creed in regards to the companions.

We respond to this with the angels du’a in the Qur’an:

“Those (angels) who bear the Throne and those around it glorify the praises of their Lord, and believe in Him, and ask forgiveness for those who believe (saying): ‘Our Lord! You comprehend all things in mercy and knowledge, so forgive those who repent and follow Your Way, and save them from the torment of the blazing Fire! Our Lord! And make them enter the Paradise which you have promised them, and to the righteous among their fathers, their wives, and their offspring! Verily, You are the All-Mighty, the All-Wise. And save them from the sins, and whomsoever You save from the sins that Day, him verily, You have taken into mercy.” And that is the supreme success.’” (Qur’an 40: 7-9)

The beauty of this du’a is that it says: ‘for those who believe’ and ‘those who repent and follow Your Way’.

Thus, if Abu Bakr, Umar, Uthman, Ali, Muaviya, Yazid or anyone else are those people, then the du’a lands on them. And if Abu Bakr, Umar, Uthman, Ali, Muaviya, Yazid or anyone else are not them, then the du’a misses them.

The point being that is the purview of Allah (swt).

May Allah Guide the Ummah.

May Allah Forgive the Ummah.

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Hadith: Do not revile/curse my companions

“That was a nation which has passed on. It will have what it earned, and you will have what you have earned. And you will not be asked about what they used to do.” (Qur’an 2:133-134)

Or do you say that Abraham and Ishmael and Isaac and Jacob and the Descendants were Jews or Christians? Say, “Are you more knowing or is Allah ?” And who is more unjust than one who conceals a testimony he has from Allah? And Allah is not unaware of what you do That is a nation that has passed on. It will have what it earned, and you will have what you have earned. And you will not be asked about what they used to do. Those are people who have passed away; theirs is that which they earned and yours that which ye earn. And ye will not be asked of what they used to do(Qur’an 2:140-141)

﷽ 

It has been said about the Ibadi school, that we revile, abuse and curse the companions!

It has been said that we are Khawarij who curse, revile and abuse the companions.

Nothing can be further from the truth! 

When you hear people say such things about us, ask them to bring their evidence! 

Please listen to what our teacher and Shaykh Dr. Khalid bin Mohammed Al Abdali (Hafidullah) shares with us what should be the stance of the Muslims in regard to the companions and those who have gone before us.

One group says about some of the companions of the Blessed Messenger (saw) that they “Are the dogs of hellfire!

Another group says, “These are sinners and have disobeyed the order of Allah.”

Who is doing the cursing? Who is doing the reviling?

In our books, the Ibadi, we haven’t named someone a dog from the dogs of Jahannam. Al hamdulllah! That Allah (swt) has purified our tongues from it.  That being said, we do not say the Sahabah/companions were all angels and saints. We tell the history.

This should be very clear. If our books say that such and such a companion is a sinner or sinned, that is not reviling anyone. It is simply reporting the news. If our books say such and such a companion went against the amr, the command of Allah (swt), that is not reviling anyone. That is simply reporting the news.

You are welcome to dispute with us about whether such and such a companion sinned on this or that occasion, but stop saying that the Ibadi revile, curse or abuse the companions. Even worse one recent individual who claimed to be a teacher of the Ashari school claimed the Ibadi say that Uthman and Ali committed Shirk! Authubillah min dhalik! When pressed for a proof he deleted his post and made amends for it. This is the sign of sincerity.

It is the Ahl Khilaf (The People of the opposition). It is their books that are filled with statements companions reviling each other. 

It was our teachers (Ibadi scholars) who approached Umar Ibn Abdul Aziz (ra), who was a righteous Caliph and a just Imam. It was they who went to him and urged him to stop the cursing and reviling of the companions at the minbar. It is not the place for it.

In fact, if you want to see who really reviled who see this entry. Read it and weep!

Abu Huraira reported Allah’s Messenger (saw) as saying:

Do not revile my Companions, do not revile my Companions. By Him in Whose Hand is my life, if one amongst you would have spent as much gold as Uhud it would not amount to as much as one much on behalf of one of them or half of it.”

Source: (https://sunnah.com/muslim:2540)

Narrated Anas:

The Prophet (saw) said, “Some of my companions will come to me at my Lake Fount, and after I recognize them, they will then be taken away from me, whereupon I will say, ‘My companions!’ Then it will be said, ‘You do not know what they innovated (new things) in the religion after you.”

Source: (https://sunnah.com/bukhari:6582)

It was narrated from Abu Hurairah that the Prophet (saw) came to a graveyard and greeted (its occupants) with Salam, then he said:

“Peace be upon you, abode of believing people. We will join you soon, if Allah wills.” Then he said: “Would that we could see our brothers.” They said: “O Messenger of Allah, are we not your brothers?” He said: “You are my Companions. My brothers are those who will come after me. I will reach the Cistern ahead of you.” They said: “O Messenger of Allah, how will you recognize those of your nation who have not yet come?” He said: “If a man has a horse with a blaze on its forehead and white feet, don’t you think that he will recognize it among horses that are deep black in color?” They said: “Of course.” He said: “On the Day of Resurrection they will come with radiant faces, hands, and feet, because of the traces of ablution.” He said: “I will reach the Cistern ahead of you.” Then he said: “Men will be driven away from my Cistern just as stray camels are driven away. And I will call to them: ‘Come here!’ But it will be said: ‘They changed after you were gone, and they kept turning on their heels.’ So I will say: “Be off with you!

Source: (https://sunnah.com/ibnmajah:4306)

Narrated Jabir bin `Abdullah:

We were in a Ghazwa and a man from the emigrants kicked an Ansari (on the buttocks with his foot). The Ansari man said, “O the Ansari! (Help!)” The emigrant said, “O the emigrants! (Help).” When Allah’s Messenger (saw) heard that, he said, “What is that?” They said, “A man from the emigrants kicked a man from the Ansar (on the buttocks his foot). On that the Ansar said, ‘O the Ansar!’ and the emigrant said, ‘O the emigrants!” The Prophet (saw) said’ “Leave it (that call) for it Is a detestable thing.” The number of Ansar was larger (than that of the emigrants) at the time when the Prophet (saw) came to Medina, but later the number of emigrants increased. `Abdullah bin Ubai said, “Have they, (the emigrants) done so? By Allah, if we return to Medina, surely, the more honorable will expel therefrom the meaner,” `Umar bin Al-Khattab said, “O Allah’s Messenger (saw)! Let me chop off the head of this hypocrite!” The Prophet said, “Leave him, lest the people say Muhammad kills his companions:”

Source: (https://sunnah.com/bukhari:4907)

Narrated Ibn `Umar:

The Prophet (saw) sent (an army unit under the command of) Khalid bin Al-Walid to fight against the tribe of Bani Jadhima and those people could not express themselves by saying, “Aslamna,” but they said, “Saba’na! Saba’na! ” Khalid kept on killing some of them and taking some others as captives, and he gave a captive to everyone of us and ordered everyone of us to kill his captive. I said, “By Allah, I shall not kill my captive and none of my companions shall kill his captive!” Then we mentioned that to the Prophet (saw) and he said, “O Allah! I am free from what Khalid bin Al-Walid has done,” and repeated it twice.

Source: (https://sunnah.com/bukhari:7189)

Sunni and Shi’i narrators state that Ali ibn Abu Talib led the prayers either while intoxicated or in a major state of ritual impurity.

So are they reviling, rebuking and cursing Ali for simply reporting the facts?

Or what about the reviling and rebuking Ahl Sunnah has done of the noble companion Hurqus Ibn Zuhair (ra) ?

Or what about the tremendous and horrible statement put into the mouth of the Blessed Messenger (saw), calling some of his companions “the dogs of hellfire?” Many are those from among the Shi’i and Ah Sunnah quotes this with absolutely no shame.

What about the Salafi preacher who really did curse one of the companions, Amr b. al-Hamiq al-Khuza’i for stabbing Uthman in the chest 9 times!

What about Ibn Taymiyyah’s damning admission that the majority of the companions hated Ali?

So we would implore those in dawah, and we would implore teachers and learned people from among the Sunni and Shi’i to be educated on this matter. You may not agree with us, and you are free to differ with us, but you do not have a license to lie about us or misrepresent us.

In fact, on matters of lying and not being truthful, one should have awareness and fear of Allah (swt) who sees and knows all that we do.

May Allah (swt) guide us all to what is beloved to him.

May Allah Guide the Ummah.

May Allah Forgive the Ummah.

2 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized