Tag Archives: companions

al-walāya (allegiance) and al-barā’a (disavowal) with the companions and other matters.

“My Lord! Increase me in knowledge.” (Qur’an 20:114)

﷽ 

We have the principle of al-walāya (allegiance) and al-barā’a (disavowal), which are either general or specific. The  specificity is either established by truth through a text from the Book of Allah and direct hearing from the Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him. Or apparent through observation, acknowledgment, testimony of just witnesses, or evident truth supported by proof. If someone’s status is unclear, one should refrain from including them in al-walāya or al-barā’a. No one is definitively assigned to Paradise or Hell except those who are in the state of true allegiance and true disavowal, as established by a text from the Book of Allah and direct hearing from the Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him.

The Companions and others are equal in this principle, except that the default for the Companions is al-walāya (allegiance) only.

Allah’s rulings encompass everyone, and no one is above the ruling of Allah Almighty.

The status of the companions of the Blessed Prophet (saw).

The position of our school is not in agreement with those who call themselves the people of the Sunnah. Their position is that all the companions are considered just and righteous.

However, our school is not built upon the praise of anyone other than the Blessed Prophet (saw). Nor is it built upon the cursing of anyone other than Iblis and his minions.

We can console ourselves with the noble verse of the Qur’an:

“That is a nation which has passed on. It will have [the consequence of] what it earned, and you will have what you have earned. And you will not be asked about what they used to do.” (Qur’an 2:141)

For the layperson and the laity, the default position is one of wuqoof. This means pausing or to stop on anyone we are not certain of.  It is based upon insufficient data. This is the position of the vast majority of people in our school, as the vast majority are the laity. 

That is to say they are in wuqoof with all those companions in which there is some dispute about their status in our school. Uthman, Ali, Talha, Zubayr, for example. 

They need not concern themselves with these disputes that happened among the companions. However, the scholars or those who have studied under them take various positions based upon what they feel is sufficient data. That sufficient data may lead them to disavow a companion or to put a companion in guardianship.

What is also important is that everyone in our school ascribes to general friendship as well as general dissociation. So, no matter the conclusions we reach based upon apparent evidence, our friendship or dissociation is with people based upon reality.

What does this mean in a practical sense? 

Example 1

You put person A in Bara’ah based upon some apparent evidence. Based upon the current condition of person A. 

However, since you declared the Walayah al-Jumlah and that person had a good ending, they are in wilayah with you in reality.  

You made an ijtihad based upon the conditions of the person that were apparent to you at the time.

Example 2 

You put person A in Walayah based upon some apparent evidence. Based upon the current condition of person A. 

However, since you declared the Bara’ah al-Jumlah and that person had a bad ending, they are in bara’ah with you in reality.  

You made an ijtihad based upon the conditions of the person that were apparent to you at the time.

How to declare the intention for the general wilayah and the general bara’ah?

Walayah al-Jumlah – The general or common friendship.

One declares (you reading this can declare now.) “I ally with every single person among mankind and jinn who ever lived or ever will live that is righteous.”

Bara’ah al-Jumlah – The general or common dissociation.

One declares (you reading this can declare now.) “I disown every person among mankind and jinn whoever lived or ever will live that will be among the denizens of hellfire.”

It is to say in your heart: Anybody Allah loves, I love him. Anyone whom Allah hates, I hate them. 

Thus, if Uthman, Ali, Talha, Zubayr fall into either category, we have already declared our love for them or a disavow of them based upon reality.

How many are those who declare with their tongues that which is not in their hearts?

“They were closer to disbelief than to belief on that day—for saying with their mouths what was not in their hearts. Allah is All-Knowing of what they hide.” (Qur’an 3:167)

How can an individual be both in walayah and bara’ah with the righteous?

Possible scenario.

Person A left Gwadar Port. The people of that place know person A to be upright and fair dealing. However, Person A, when he arrives in Port Bell, is known to swindle and cheat people.

The righteous people at Gwadar port judge based upon his outward actions. The righteous at Port Bell judge based upon his outward actions.

The actions of the person in Port Bell never reach the people of Gwadar port.

Walayah and Bara’ah are ultimately not about personal relationships.

Allah is always the focus!

Whether it is a relationship between yourself and another person. Or a relationship between person A and person B. You are neither person A nor person B. 

Example: You have someone who is very close to you. Your mother, your father, or even your child. You love this person. You have familiar ties to that person. However, if this person is a sinner. They would be in bara’ah for the duration of the time they indulge the sin. It has nothing to do with your relationship to them at any given moment and everything to do with their relationship to Allah at any given moment.

Example: There is a tyrant ruler. This tyrant ruler gives everyone their full rights. This person prays the five daily prayers. However, he gets drunk. He drinks alcohol. In this case, do you ally with him or dissociate from him? Even though he treats you well and gives you your full rights. Because he drinks alcohol in that condition, he is an enemy of Allah (swt). He will be so for the duration of the time he spends doing so. Your relationship with this ruler may be cordial, but you disown him because it has nothing to do with your relationship to him at any given moment and everything to do with his relationship to Allah at any given moment

Example: A fellow Muslim for whom, whatever reason, you do not like. Human beings can be fickle. Maybe it is the way they laugh or anything at all you personally find fault with.  However, that person prays, fasts and does not commit any sins that you are aware of. No matter your personal feelings towards this person, you must ally with them.  They are in wilaya with you, and you cannot put this person in bara’ah based upon personal feelings or a whim. That is because it has nothing to do with your relationship between him and you at any given moment and everything to do with his relationship to Allah at any given moment. 

This is more about recognizing the rights of Allah (swt). Allah (swt) reigns supreme over all his creation.

You might be interested to read our other articles on the subject here:

May Allah Guide the Ummah.

May Allah Forgive the Ummah.

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Hadith: Do not revile/curse my companions

“That was a nation which has passed on. It will have what it earned, and you will have what you have earned. And you will not be asked about what they used to do.” (Qur’an 2:133-134)

Or do you say that Abraham and Ishmael and Isaac and Jacob and the Descendants were Jews or Christians? Say, “Are you more knowing or is Allah ?” And who is more unjust than one who conceals a testimony he has from Allah? And Allah is not unaware of what you do That is a nation that has passed on. It will have what it earned, and you will have what you have earned. And you will not be asked about what they used to do. Those are people who have passed away; theirs is that which they earned and yours that which ye earn. And ye will not be asked of what they used to do(Qur’an 2:140-141)

﷽ 

It has been said about the Ibadi school, that we revile, abuse and curse the companions!

It has been said that we are Khawarij who curse, revile and abuse the companions.

Nothing can be further from the truth! 

When you hear people say such things about us, ask them to bring their evidence! 

Please listen to what our teacher and Shaykh Dr. Khalid bin Mohammed Al Abdali (Hafidullah) shares with us what should be the stance of the Muslims in regard to the companions and those who have gone before us.

One group says about some of the companions of the Blessed Messenger (saw) that they “Are the dogs of hellfire!

Another group says, “These are sinners and have disobeyed the order of Allah.”

Who is doing the cursing? Who is doing the reviling?

In our books, the Ibadi, we haven’t named someone a dog from the dogs of Jahannam. Al hamdulllah! That Allah (swt) has purified our tongues from it.  That being said, we do not say the Sahabah/companions were all angels and saints. We tell the history.

This should be very clear. If our books say that such and such a companion is a sinner or sinned, that is not reviling anyone. It is simply reporting the news. If our books say such and such a companion went against the amr, the command of Allah (swt), that is not reviling anyone. That is simply reporting the news.

You are welcome to dispute with us about whether such and such a companion sinned on this or that occasion, but stop saying that the Ibadi revile, curse or abuse the companions.

It is the Ahl Khilaf (The People of the opposition). It is their books that are filled with statements companions reviling each other. 

It was our teachers (Ibadi scholars) who approached Umar Ibn Abdul Aziz (ra), who was a righteous Caliph and a just Imam. It was they who went to him and urged him to stop the cursing and reviling of the companions at the minbar. It is not the place for it.

In fact, if you want to see who really reviled who see this entry. Read it and weep!

Abu Huraira reported Allah’s Messenger (saw) as saying:

Do not revile my Companions, do not revile my Companions. By Him in Whose Hand is my life, if one amongst you would have spent as much gold as Uhud it would not amount to as much as one much on behalf of one of them or half of it.”

Source: (https://sunnah.com/muslim:2540)

Narrated Anas:

The Prophet (saw) said, “Some of my companions will come to me at my Lake Fount, and after I recognize them, they will then be taken away from me, whereupon I will say, ‘My companions!’ Then it will be said, ‘You do not know what they innovated (new things) in the religion after you.”

Source: (https://sunnah.com/bukhari:6582)

It was narrated from Abu Hurairah that the Prophet (saw) came to a graveyard and greeted (its occupants) with Salam, then he said:

“Peace be upon you, abode of believing people. We will join you soon, if Allah wills.” Then he said: “Would that we could see our brothers.” They said: “O Messenger of Allah, are we not your brothers?” He said: “You are my Companions. My brothers are those who will come after me. I will reach the Cistern ahead of you.” They said: “O Messenger of Allah, how will you recognize those of your nation who have not yet come?” He said: “If a man has a horse with a blaze on its forehead and white feet, don’t you think that he will recognize it among horses that are deep black in color?” They said: “Of course.” He said: “On the Day of Resurrection they will come with radiant faces, hands, and feet, because of the traces of ablution.” He said: “I will reach the Cistern ahead of you.” Then he said: “Men will be driven away from my Cistern just as stray camels are driven away. And I will call to them: ‘Come here!’ But it will be said: ‘They changed after you were gone, and they kept turning on their heels.’ So I will say: “Be off with you!

Source: (https://sunnah.com/ibnmajah:4306)

Narrated Jabir bin `Abdullah:

We were in a Ghazwa and a man from the emigrants kicked an Ansari (on the buttocks with his foot). The Ansari man said, “O the Ansari! (Help!)” The emigrant said, “O the emigrants! (Help).” When Allah’s Messenger (saw) heard that, he said, “What is that?” They said, “A man from the emigrants kicked a man from the Ansar (on the buttocks his foot). On that the Ansar said, ‘O the Ansar!’ and the emigrant said, ‘O the emigrants!” The Prophet (saw) said’ “Leave it (that call) for it Is a detestable thing.” The number of Ansar was larger (than that of the emigrants) at the time when the Prophet (saw) came to Medina, but later the number of emigrants increased. `Abdullah bin Ubai said, “Have they, (the emigrants) done so? By Allah, if we return to Medina, surely, the more honorable will expel therefrom the meaner,” `Umar bin Al-Khattab said, “O Allah’s Messenger (saw)! Let me chop off the head of this hypocrite!” The Prophet said, “Leave him, lest the people say Muhammad kills his companions:”

Source: (https://sunnah.com/bukhari:4907)

Narrated Ibn `Umar:

The Prophet (saw) sent (an army unit under the command of) Khalid bin Al-Walid to fight against the tribe of Bani Jadhima and those people could not express themselves by saying, “Aslamna,” but they said, “Saba’na! Saba’na! ” Khalid kept on killing some of them and taking some others as captives, and he gave a captive to everyone of us and ordered everyone of us to kill his captive. I said, “By Allah, I shall not kill my captive and none of my companions shall kill his captive!” Then we mentioned that to the Prophet (saw) and he said, “O Allah! I am free from what Khalid bin Al-Walid has done,” and repeated it twice.

Source: (https://sunnah.com/bukhari:7189)

Sunni and Shi’i narrators state that Ali ibn Abu Talib led the prayers either while intoxicated or in a major state of ritual impurity.

So are they reviling, rebuking and cursing Ali for simply reporting the facts?

Or what about the reviling and rebuking Ahl Sunnah has done of the noble companion Hurqus Ibn Zuhair (ra) ?

Or what about the tremendous and horrible statement put into the mouth of the Blessed Messenger (saw), calling some of his companions “the dogs of hellfire?” Many are those from among the Shi’i and Ah Sunnah quotes this with absolutely no shame.

What about the Salafi preacher who really did curse one of the companions, Amr b. al-Hamiq al-Khuza’i for stabbing Uthman in the chest 9 times!

What about Ibn Taymiyyah’s damning admission that the majority of the companions hated Ali?

So we would implore those in dawah, and we would implore teachers and learned people from among the Sunni and Shi’i to be educated on this matter. You may not agree with us, and you are free to differ with us, but you do not have a license to lie about us or misrepresent us.

In fact, on matters of lying and not being truthful, one should have awareness and fear of Allah (swt) who sees and knows all that we do.

May Allah (swt) guide us all to what is beloved to him.

May Allah Guide the Ummah.

May Allah Forgive the Ummah.

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized