Sociological Experiment: Ali, Umar and Fatima

“Indeed, Allah commands you to render trusts to whom they are due and when you judge between people to judge with justice. Excellent is that which Allah instructs you. Indeed, Allah is ever Hearing and Seeing.” (Qur’an 4:58) 

﷽ 

This is a sociological experiment our colleague conducted on their social media regarding the tale of some from among the Shi’i in relation to Umar (ra), Ali and Fatima (ra).

Narrated `Aisha:

Once, Fatima came walking and her gait resembled the gait of the Prophet (saw). The Prophet (saw) said, “Welcome, O my daughter!” Then he made her sit on his right or on his left side, and then he told her a secret and she started weeping. I asked her, “Why are you weeping?” He again told her a secret and she started laughing. I said, “I never saw happiness so near to sadness as I saw today.” I asked her what the Prophet (saw) had told her. She said, “I would never disclose the secret of Allah’s Messenger (saw).” When the Prophet (saw) died, I asked her about it. She replied. “The Prophet (saw) said: ‘Every year Gabriel used to revise the Qur’an with me once only, but this year he has done so twice. I think this portends my death, and you will be the first of my family to follow me.’ So I started weeping. Then he said. ‘Don’t you like to be the chief of all the ladies of Paradise or the chief of the believing women? So I laughed for that.” 

Source: (https://sunnah.com/bukhari:3623)

If indeed the Shi’i believe that this narration is true and that Fatima (ra) would be the first from among the family of the Beloved Messenger (saw) to die, it cannot also be true that the “unborn” son of Fatima would die as he would technically be the ‘first of my family’ to follow.

Ali bin Abi Talib said:

“When al Hassan was born, the Prophet (saw) came and said: Show me, my boy, what have you named him? I said: I called him Harb, he said: Nay,” He is Hassan When al Hussein was born, the Prophet (saw)said: Show me my boy, what have you named him? I said: Harb, he said: Nay, he is Hussein, and when the third was born, the Prophet (saw) came, then said: Show me, my boy, what have you named him? I said: Harb. He said: Nay, he is Muhassin, then he said: I have named them after the names of the children of Haroun(Aaron). They are Shibr, Shubeir, Mushabbar.” 

Source: (Musnad Ahmad 1/98, Isnad is sound)

  • لمَّا وُلِد الحَسنُ فقال أروني ابنِي ما سمَّيْتُموه قُلْتُ حَرْبًا قال بل هو حَسنٌ قال فلمَّا وُلِد الحُسَينُ سمَّيْتُه حَرْبًا فجاء رسولُ اللهِ صلَّى اللهُ عليه وسلَّم فقال أروني ابنِي ما سمَّيْتُموه قُلْتُ حَرْبًا قال بل هو حُسَينٌ فلمَّا وُلِد الثَّالِثُ سمَّيْتُه حَرْبًا فجاء النَّبيُّ صلَّى اللهُ عليه وسلَّم فقال أروني ابنِي ما سمَّيْتُموه قُلْتُ حَرْبًا قال بل هو مُحَسِّنٌ ثُمَّ قال سمَّيْتُهم بأسماءَ ولدِ هارونَ شَبَرٍ وشُبَيرٍ ومُبشِّرٍ [ وفي روايةٍ ] قال سمَّيْتُهم بأسماءِ ولدِ هارونَ جَبَرٍ وجُبَيرٍ ومُجَبِّرٍ. خلاصة حكم المحدث: رجالهما رجال الصحيح غير هانئ بن هانئ وهو ثقة‏‏
    الراوي: علي بن أبي طالب
    المحدث: الهيثمي
    المصدر: مجمع الزوائد
    الصفحة أو الرقم: 8/55
    التخريج : أخرجه أحمد (769)، وابن حبان (6958)، والطبراني (3/ 96) (2773) جميعا بلفظه.

موقع الدرر السنية – الموسوعة الحديثية
https://dorar.net/h/NmytTfjY

It’s not believable to say that Muhassin was aborted as a fetus and yet the above narration says that he was born.

Here is a video of Ayatollah Sayyid Fadhlallaha, a Shi’i Imam, who thinks this whole tale about Ali, Umar (ra) and Fatima (ra) is a big fat, juicy fabrication. For those who can’t click on English subtitles in the post, we have put the YouTube link where you can click on English subtitles.

Surely the Imam has his reward with Allah (swt) for seeking truth on the matter.

Also, remember the presence of a statement in a book does not necessarily make it authentic. We do not know of anyone who holds this position. The chains of narrators the isnad needs to be scrutinized. Do the reports contradict other pieces of evidence? This is what needs to be understood when engaging in dialogue with anyone from among the Muslims.

Now let us assume, for the sake of argument, that this incident took place as suggested by the Shi’i. Obviously, learned people like the Ayatollah above don’t buy it for a hot minute.

SOCIOLOGICAL EXPERIMENT ON FACEBOOK. I CALL THIS: “THE FATIMA EXPERIMENT”

So, knowing that Muslims have a vested interest in this alleged incident and there are emotional attachments to it, I decided to ask people who were absolutely clueless about this incident.

I decided that I would ask my non-Muslim friends about their thoughts concerning the characters of the two major individuals in this incident. So this is the data that I gave to them:


I want my non-Muslim friends to answer this question. Any Muslim who comments, I’ll delete it. This is a sociological experiment.

What would you say about a man (person A) who punched another man’s wife (person B) in the stomach and caused her to miscarry? Person B (a man) does absolutely nothing in response to person A (a man).

Later, person B marries one of his daughters to person A.

Person B names his son after person A. 

In the Fatima experiment. Person A is Umar Ibn Al Khattab (ra) and Person B is Ali ibn Abu Talib.

What follows are their responses. Some of them are quite interesting. I have covered up their names to protect/respect their personal privacy.  These are mostly U.S. Americans. They hold nothing back.

Well, so there you have it. 20 different responses to this scenario. Not favourable views of Umar (ra) and almost unanimously unfavourable views of Ali

Now we have The Lady of Heaven film that has created quite a controversy.

May Allah (swt) guide our tongues to speak the truth and our hearts to have the courage to say it. May Allah (swt) guide us from speaking falsely about any person’s incident or matter. Amin!

You may also wish to read the following:

May Allah Guide the Ummah.

May Allah Forgive the Ummah.

6 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized

6 responses to “Sociological Experiment: Ali, Umar and Fatima

  1. Mohd Adeeb's avatar Mohd Adeeb

    Assalamu Alykum brother! I really want to know your thoughts about recent decision on Hagia Sophia .

    • Walakum salaam wr wb. I am very thankful that Hagia Sophia is to be a Masjid! Al hamdulillah! After all the Christians have Cordoba/Spain, the Zionists have Jerusalem. So I am thankful that the Muslims get the Hagia Sophia to be a Mosque.

  2. omerh's avatar omerh

    Tldr: Shias don’t have a single authentic Hadeeth. I recommend the book on Mahajjah (mahajjah.com/kasr/)

    The guy in the video is Fadhlullah. The fable of the broken rib is not just some historical story. It has become part of twelver Aqeedah which is why Twelvers defend nail and tooth. The thing is that since it is a theological and another historical matter not only do Shias need to quote one Saheeh hadith of the incident taking place (which there isn’t), they have to prove tawatur (mass-transmssion).

    shias spoke against fadhlullah for rejecting the fable which has no authentic Hadeeth. I would recommend to the Shias to go read the books of Muhammad AlHussaini and compare them to what Murtadha AlAmili wrote in response. Any objective truth seeker will reach the conclusion as fadhlullah.

    for those who don’t know Arabic, unfortunately, you have to depend on Mahajjah. This is the best and only book available on the topic https://mahajjah.com/kasr/

    Not only will you learn why the event of the broken rib is a fable, but you will also master some of the basics of Shia Hadeeth science.

    Unfortunately, the English version is still under construction but you can read what has been translated so far

    . The book discusses the work of both Murtadha AlAmiliee and the ones that refute him (including Muhammad AlHussaini). So it is not biased. If you know Arabic, I highly recommend you watch the commentary of سيد مازن (in the live section of YouTube), instead of reading the book, because of how much more info you would learn from him.

  3. omerh's avatar omerh

    So imagine that Ali was usurped from the caliphate for 25 years, his right was lost, his wife’s rib was broken, she died because of that, her fetus was miscarried, and their house was destroyed. On top of all that, Ali bin Abi Talib immediately marries the mother of the boys, may God be pleased with her, in only nine days, and marries ten women!

    In fact, more than 25 children were born – according to the smallest number mentioned in the narrations – after the death of Fatima, according to Shiite narrations!

    On top of all this, he married his daughter to Fatima (Umm Kulthum) to the Commander of the Faithful Omar bin Al-Khattab, may God be pleased with him and please him in the year 17 AH – also according to the recognition of Shiite scholars such as Al-Majlisi –

    What is even surprising is that Ali named the children of three of his children whom he had after the death of Fatima: Abu Bakr, Omar, and Othman!

    The strange thing is that Ali’s house was supposedly destroyed, broken, and burned due to Omar’s attack on it. Did Ali have the time to build and renovate the house in just 9 days in order to marry the om albanin in it?

    Also, one of Ali’s wives was Abu Bakr’s widow – Ali married her, Asma bint Umays, after Abu Bakr’s death – and he raised Abu Bakr’s children.

    We are addressing rational people: Is it reasonable for a man who has been subjected to all these great circumstances and calamities, who lives with him in the same city, to marry this number of women after the death of his wife, whom you say was killed, her rib was broken, and her fetus miscarried, and to give birth to this number of children and even give his children names? Who oppressed him, usurped his caliphate, and killed his wife, especially since the name “Abu Bakr” during their reign was only a nickname for Abu Bakr Al-Siddiq, the first caliph and the best of this nation after the Prophet, may God bless him and grant him peace?

    • These are all very excellent and insightful points.

      My objective here was to perform a social experiment and to not ask the Muslims about any of this. As they may have vested interest.

      So I asked non Muslims (those I knew were not familiar with anything in relation to Islam) and I didn’t even mention Islam, or Muslims.

      I used names of people that are every day names in the former United States.

      So I wanted to see what an objective audience would think of the situation.

Leave a reply to primaquran Cancel reply